ALIGHT.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Phase I/IIa, prospective, parallel group, single‐centre, unmasked, randomised controlled trial One eye selected, non‐exudative age‐related macular degeneration |
|
Participants | Country: United Kingdom
Number of people randomised: 60
Age: range 55 to 88 years
Sex: 57% female
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Equivalence of baseline characteristics |
|
Interventions | Intervention: Noctura 500 eye mask (LED 505 nm 23 scotopic Trolands) worn eight hours every night for 12 months n = 30 Comparator: no treatment n = 30 |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes:
Contrast sensitivity, near vision, low luminance deficit score, loss of 15 or more EDTRS letters and reading speed were not reported. |
|
Notes | Study name: Alight Dates of recruitment of participants: 04/2014 to 02/2015 Sources of funding: research grant from the College of Optometrists, London, UK Declaration of interest: two authors declared a personal financial interest, indicating they are "inventor/developer designated on a patent, patent application, copyright, or trade secret, whether or not the patent, copyright, etc. is presently licensed or otherwise commercialized, which is the subject matter of your publication or could be in competition with the technology described". Trial investigators were contacted. Trial registration: ISCTRN 82148651 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation sequence using permutated blocks stratified according to AREDs scores 2, 3 and 4. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation allocation number provided in envelopes to study investigator. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants and personnel unmasked to treatment. Clinicians treating fellow eye with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration masked to treatment. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Masking of treating clinicians; however, communication from participants could remove masking. Assessors of primary outcome were masked but not for secondary outcomes. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Compliance with wearing treatment mask was 78%. Nine participants withdrew from study due to mask discomfort. Drusen volume data was missing for 24 participants. Final visits for six participants were conducted outside study protocol. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes mentioned in the protocol were reported. |