Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar 24;69(7):1933–1940. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17097

Table 1.

Characteristics of participating decision-makers: discordant interviews (n=51).

Characteristic Residents (n=26) Surrogates (n=25)

Age, mean (±SD) 79.9 (± 8.6) 63 (±8.8)

Gender, female 21 (80.8%) 19 (76%)

Race
White 23 (88.5%) 21 (84%)
Black or African American 1 (3.8%) 2 (8%)
American Indian or Alaska Native 1 (3.8%) 0
More Than One Race 1 (3.8%) 2 (8%)

Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino 1 (3.8%) 0

Relationship to resident
Spouse n/a 3 (12%)
Child/child-in-law 15(60%)
Niece/nephew 4 (16%)
Grandchild 2 (8%)
Friend 1 (4%)

Schooling
Some high school 4 (15.4%) 0
Graduated high school 8 (30.8%) 7 (28%)
College and above 14 (53.8%) 18 (72%)

Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status Score, mean (±SD)a 30.6 (± 3.1) 36.2 (±2.7)

Health Literacy, mean (±SD)b 1.5 (± 0.7) 0.9 (± 0.8)
a

TICS™ (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status) score is a measure of cognition, where scores <20 indicate moderate to severe impairment, 21–25 indicates mild impairment, 26–32 indicates ambiguous cognitive status, and 33–41 indicates no impairment.13

b

Health literacy score ranges from 0–4, where higher scores indicate lower health literacy.13,14