Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;166(9):2529–2540. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05149-0

Table 1.

Comparisons of RT-qPCR and ddPCR results obtained using serial dilutions of SARS-CoV-2-infected samples and negative controls

Samples RT-qPCR (Cq) ddPCR (droplets)
N RdRP (IP4) N positive RdRP (IP4) positive Accepted
A549 24H 1.0 E-02 15.99 16.01 13566 13566 13566
A549 24H 1.0 E-03 19.09 19.23 15106 15106 15106
A549 24H 1.0 E-04 22.24 22.53 12839 12839 12839
A549 24H 1.0 E-05 25.64 26.01 8435 3626 13203
A549 24H 1.0 E-06 29.20 29.26 1114 350 11081
A549 24H 1.0 E-07 32.60 32.90 160 45 13507
A549 24H 1.0 E-08 34.94 37.39 15 2 12290
200132 E-03 23.36 21.79 6415 6332 10286
200132 E-04 27.14 25.62 5075 4256 13375
200132 E-05 29.65 28.11 783 564 12615
200132 E-06 32.90 31.44 34 32 11851
200132 E-07 38.07 37.33 45 34 14180
200132 E-08 N/A N/A 1 1 15403
293T (1) 39.54 N/A 0 0 12993
293T (2) N/A N/A 1 0 11477
H20 N/A N/A 0 0 13076

Tenfold dilutions of RNA extracts from an infected cell line (A549-ACE2) and a patient (n#200132) diagnosed as strongly positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA were compared using RT-qPCR and ddPCR. Accepted droplets correspond to the total count of bona fide droplets as detected in a given well by the droplet reader. RNA extracted from uninfected 293T cells was used as a negative control.