Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 28;8:690206. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.690206

TABLE 1.

Comparison of the risk model and other models.

Study Signature AUCs in the training set AUCs in the validation set
Our study 5-Gene 0.774, 0.715, and 0.677 (TCGA N = 365) 0.734, 0.725, and 0.738 (ICGC N = 231)
Liu et al. (2020) 7-Gene 0.778, 0.754, and 0.742 (TCGA N = 365) 0.717, 0.636, and 0.616 (ICGC N = 231)
Ouyang et al. (2020) 12-Gene 0.77, 0.73, and 0.72 (TCGA N = 365) 0.630, 0.680, and 0.660 (GEO N = 233)
Zhang et al. (2020) 9-Gene 0.805 (TCGA N = 365) 0.582 (ICGC N = 231)
Pan et al. (2020) 4-Gene 0.700, 0.652, and 0.630 (TCGA N = 365) No external validation