Table 3.
ETEC vaccine-related characteristics and potential endpoints for future trials.
Research area | Current assumptions | Research gaps | Recommendations to address gaps |
---|---|---|---|
Target population | Timing is constrained by EPI schedule and need to provide protection in the first year of life when the case fatality rate (CFR) for acute diarrheal illness is greatest | Immunogenicity as a function of age for principal candidates in infants in LMICs is a question; target age-group has proven difficult to immunize effectively | Trial size sufficient to permit age stratification of results based on age of initial dose; novel approaches to improve mucosal immunogenicity in infants need to be exploded; also explore combination approaches |
Efficacy | Innate immunity is equal across populations | Histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) appear to influence rates of infection and severity of disease in children to strains expressing canonical vaccine antigens CFA/I, CS3, CS5 and CS6 (PMID: 30768135) | Efficacy studies in populations should test subject HBGA to account for heterogeneity between populations in multi-site studies and within study populations |
Epidemiologically important CFA and non-canonical antigenic determinants, like EtpA and EatA are stable over time and place and are compelling candidates for inclusion in vaccines | Combination needs to be optimized to broaden coverage and efficacy | Multi-site Phase 2/3 trials should confirm this supposition and robust nature of protection | |
ETEC vaccine need to have more public health benefit than preventing mortality and MSD diarrhoea. Reduction in other negative acute or more long-term negative health outcomes need to be considered | WHO ETEC vaccine PPC has called for new pre-clinical, CHIMs and field research to evaluate vaccine impacts on disease severity beyond diarrhoea and their ability to interfere with the pathogenic pathway to stunting and poor neurodevelopment | New secondary/exploratory endpoints targeting vaccine impact on reducing intestinal inflammation; growth deficits, markers of cognitive development and disease severity scores need to be evaluated in future field trials and if validated be used future pivotal Phase 3 supporting vaccine licensure | |
Formulation and Presentation | Improved temperature stability and simple vaccine presentation facilitating delivery are important parameters that contribute to a favourable FVVA and increase uptake | Lead cellular and subunit ETEC vaccine candidates need additional formulation and presentation research to ensure they meet WHO PPC specifications and improve their prospect for widespread uptake following licensure | Strategies need to be explored to improve the temperature stability and cold-chain foot print of the most advanced ETEC candidates, ensuring that vaccine and antigen co-formulations are more standardized, stable and also develop presentations that facilitate use in Phase 3 trials. Use of the VTIA tool recently developed by PATH and WHO can help in optimizing vaccine presentation |