Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;21:1377. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11426-z

Table 4.

Bivariate correlates of current FP use at 18-month Follow-Up (n = 339)

Total
n (%)
No current FP use (n = 131) Current FP use (n = 208) P-value a
Community (study arm) 0.093
 Intervention 185 (54.57) 64 (48.85) 121 (58.17)
 Comparison 154 (45.43) 67 (51.15) 87 (41.83)
Demographics
Age 0.519
  ≤ 30 186 (54.87) 69 (52.67) 117 (56.25)
  > 30 153 (45.13) 62 (47.33) 91 (43.75)
Education 0.975
 None/some primary 241 (71.09) 93 (70.99) 148 (71.15)
 Some secondary + 98 (28.91) 38 (29.01) 60 (28.85)
Relationship status 0.657
 Single/divorced/widowed 194 (57.23) 73 (55.73) 121 (58.17)
 Married/partnered 145 (42.77) 58 (44.27) 87 (41.83)
Ethnicity b 0.916
 Non-local groups 139 (41.00) 53 (40.46) 86 (41.35)
 Local groups (Hehe, Bena) 199 (58.70) 77 (58.78) 122 (58.65)
HIV serostatus 0.957
 Negative 165 (48.67) 64 (48.85) 101 (48.56)
 Positive 174 (51.33) 67 (51.15) 107 (51.44)
Work-Related Risk Factors
# Clients per week 0.002
 0–1 184 (54.28) 85 (64.89) 99 (47.60)
 2+ 155 (45.72) 46 (35.11) 109 (52.40)
Consistent condom use (CCU) (30 days) 0.251
 No 166 (48.97) 59 (45.04) 107 (51.44)
 Yes 173 (51.03) 72 (54.96) 101 (48.56)
Venue type 0.036
 Local bar & other 220 (64.90) 94 (71.76) 126 (60.58)
 Modern bar 119 (35.10) 37 (28.24) 82 (39.42)
Reproductive History Factors
Lifetime pregnancies 0.585
 0–2 180 (53.10) 72 (54.96) 108 (51.92)
 3+ 159 (46.90) 59 (45.04) 100 (48.08)
Previously used modern FP method (ever at baseline) < 0.001
 No 56 (16.52) 40 (30.53) 16 (7.69)
 Yes 283 (83.48) 91 (69.47) 192 (92.31)

a Chi-squared; b Refused to answer n = 1; Bold = significant at p < 0.05 level