Table 2.
Deliberation event assessment*.
| “A” | “B” | “C” | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 PM | Day 2 AM | Day 2 PM | Day 1 PM | Day 2 AM | Day 2 PM | Day 1 PM | Day 2 AM | Day 2 PM | ||
| Analytic | Information base: Participants | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Information base: Experts | 4 | N/A | N/A | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | |
| Info accuracy and support | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Prioritize values | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |
| Range of solutions | N/A | N/A | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | N/A | 5 | 5 | |
| Evaluating evidence | N/A | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | N/A | 4 | 4 | |
| Weigh pros and cons | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |
| Social | Equal speaking opportunity | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Sharing personal experience | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| Sharing personal knowledge | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Mutual comprehension | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Consider other ideas | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Authentic participation | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |
| Mutual respect | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Approach | Unbiased framing | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Representativeness | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Clearly defined tasks | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Opportunities for feedback | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | |
| Community/Group identity | N/A | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
*
Tribal site names have been anonymized and are not listed in the order the events occurred.