Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 8;43(1):1104–1114. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1948428

Table 5.

Differences of IL-6, TNF-α and APACHEII among three subgroups graded by the gap between eGFRcr and eGFRcysc.

Median (IQR) Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 p Value (overall) p Value (1 vs 2)* p Value (1 vs 3) p Value (2 vs 3)
IL6 (pg/ml)b 30.21 (12.46–44.92) 56.36 (28.43–203.98) 97.72 (38.44–290.65) 0.006 0.097 0.005 1.000
TNFα (pg/ml)c 7.6 (6.3–11.6) 11.5 (7.3–16.7) 13.1 (8.6–20.4) 0.027 0.27 0.022 0.936
APACHEII 10 (8–13) 14 (12–20) 17 (10.5–20) 0.001 0.009 0.001 1.000
SOFA 4 (1–5) 6 (4–8) 6.5 (4–8.75) 0.002 0.006 0.005 1.000
Death 11 (57.9 %) 19 (82.6 %) 16 (66.7 %) 0.205
Glucocorticoid 16 (84.2 %) 17 (73.9 %) 20 (83.3 %) 0.632

aAll patients: n = 66, Group 1 = 19, Group 2 = 23, Group 3 = 24.

bAll patients: n = 56, Group 1 = 17, Group 2 = 18, Group 3 = 21.

cAll patients: n = 52, Group 1 = 15, Group 2 = 18, Group 3 = 19.

*Adjusted p-Value.

Groups I, II, and III represented patients with △eGFRcr-cysc %<25 %, 25 %–45 %, and >45 %, respectively.

△eGFRcr-cysc % was defined as △eGFRcr-cysc/mean of eGFRcr and eGFRcysc × 100 %. △eGFRcr-cysc %=eGFRcreGFRcysc(eGFRcr+eGFRcysc)/2.