Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;129(7):076002. doi: 10.1289/EHP7381

Table 7.

Summary of studies evaluating ocular effects.

Author and publication year Study description Route of exposure Exposure measurement Outcome(s) evaluated Outcomes(s) observed Overall confidence level for outcome Applicability for dose–response
Animal studies (inhalation)
NTP (2000) Male and female rats (Fischer 344); 2-y (105-wk) exposure Inhalation (whole body) 0, 52, 157, 314mg/m3 Histopathology of eyes No effects observed High. This study was well designed to evaluate this outcome. Evidence was presented clearly and transparently. Suitable. Multidose study with quantitative data.
NTP (1992b) Male and female mice (B6C3F1); 2-y (103-wk) exposure Inhalation (whole body) 0, 52, 157mg/m3 Examination of eyes by slit-lamp biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopic procedures No effects observed High (females). This study was well designed to evaluate this outcome. Evidence was presented clearly and transparently.
Low (males). The high mortality rate in control males has the potential to interfere with the interpretation of results.
Suitable. Multidose study with quantitative data.
Animal studies (oral)
Battelle (1980b) Male and female rats (Fischer 344); 90-d exposure Oral gavage 0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400mg/kg-d Histopathological evaluation of eyes No effects observed High. This study was well designed to evaluate this outcome. Evidence was presented clearly and transparently. Suitable. Multidose studies with quantitative data.
Battelle (1980a) Male and female mice (B6C3F1); 90-d exposure Oral gavage 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200mg/kg-d Histopathological evaluation of eyes No effects observed High. This study was well designed to evaluate this outcome. Evidence was presented clearly and transparently. Suitable. Multidose studies with quantitative data.
Holmén et al. (1999) Female rats (Brown Norway); 10-wk exposure Oral gavage 0, 100, 500, 1,000, 1,500mg/kg-d
(dosed twice per week)
Evaluation of cataractous changes using lens photography Cataractous changes correlated with naphthalene dose Medium. Some concerns were raised over the small sample size of the control and some reporting limitations (method of dosing not reported, chemical purity not reported), but overall appears to be a well-conducted study. Suitable. Multidose studies with quantitative data.
Shopp et al. (1984) Male and female mice (CD-1); 14- or 90-d exposure Oral gavage 14-d exposure: 0, 27, 53, 267mg/kg/d
90-d exposure: 0, 5.3, 53, 133mg/kg-d
Examination of eyes (methods not reported) No effects observed Medium. This study was well-designed to evaluate these outcomes, but confidence was decreased because only qualitative results are provided. Not suitable. Quantitative results not reported.
Animal studies (dermal)
Bushy Run (1986) Male and female rats (Sprague-Dawley CD); 90-d exposure Dermal 0, 100, 300, 1,000mg/kg-d Examination with indirect ophthalmoscope prior to dosing and prior to final sacrifice No effects observed High. This study was well designed to evaluate this outcome. Evidence was presented clearly and transparently. Suitable. Multidose study with quantitative data.