Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.051

Table 3.

Cox proportions hazard regression of entire cohort, GG 1 group and GG 2 group predicting GG progression on subsequent biopsy

Entire Cohort
Pos Fusion Biopsy
Neg Fusion Biopsy
HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value
Age/yr 1.05 (1.01–1.09) 0.03* 1.06 (1.01–1.10) 0.02* 1.04 (0.94–1.16) 0.43
PSA density 1.04 (1.01–1.07) <0.01* 1.04 (1.01–1.07) <0.01* 1.03 (0.96–1.11) 0.39
African American 1.31 (0.54–3.18) 0.55 2.60 (0.93–7.26) 0.07 0.56 (0.07–4.59) 0.59
In-house MRI suspicion score greater than moderate 0.40 (0.10–1.70) 0.22 0.42 (0.10–1.78) 0.24
No. MRI visible lesions 1.05 (0.83–1.34) 0.67 0.97 (0.74–1.26) 0.81 1.54 (0.77–3.06) 0.22
Largest lesion diameter 1.29 (0.73–2.28) 0.38 2.04 (1.12–3.72) 0.02* 0.27 (0.05–1.45) 0.13
Neg fusion biopsy 0.41 (0.22–0.77) <0.01*
*

Statistically significant (p <0.05).