Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
letter
. 2021 May 16;35(7):e23824. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23824

An insight into the genome of a Listeria monocytogenes strain isolated from a bloodstream infection and phylogenetic analysis

Weizhong wang 1, Juan Xu 2, Yanmin Chen 1, Zhongliang Zhu 1, Fang He 1,
PMCID: PMC8274992  PMID: 33998057

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Dear Editor,

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram‐positive, non‐sporeforming, facultatively anaerobic bacilli that can commonly isolated from various animals, humans, and environment. It is pathogenic to humans and often regarded as a paradigm for intracellular parasitism. 1 Due to its widespread distribution, Lmonocytogenes has many opportunities to enter human food processing environment, resulting in contamination of food production. 2 , 3 Infection of humans ingesting colonized food is potentiated by the ability of the organism to multiply at 4°C. As a food‐borne pathogen, Lmonocytogenes primarily causes febrile gastroenteritis, and in severe cases can also cause septicemia, meningitis, and central nervous system infection with a high mortality. 4 , 5 , 6 Lmonocytogenes caused blood stream infection has been reported sporadically worldwide. However, genomic and phylogenetic feature of Lmonocytogenes strains causing septicemia are not fully understood. Here, we report the genome sequence of a clinical Lmonocytogenes strain isolated from a blood stream infection of an immunocompetent patient in China. Genotypic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of this strain were further conducted.

Lmonocytogenes strain CDHLST was isolated from a blood sample of a 41‐year‐old male patient who hospitalized in the department of infectious disease in a teaching hospital in Zhejiang Province and diagnosed with septicemia in 2019. The patient was physically fit in the past, without history of hypertension, diabetes, infectious diseases, allergies, or surgery except for alcoholic hepatitis and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Initial routine blood test and procalcitonin (PCT) were as follows: white blood cells (WBCs), 10.91 × 109/L (neutrophils 89.2%, lymphocytes 6.4%); red blood cell, 3.91 × 1012/L and PCT, 0.25 ng/ml. Three days later after his hospitalization, result of routine blood test and PCT were changed to white blood cells (WBCs), 13.70 × 109/L (neutrophils 86.7%, lymphocytes 9.1%); red blood cell, 3.57 × 1012/L and PCT, 1.89 ng/ml. Bacterial culture of blood samples suggested a Lmonocytogenes septicemia. Ampicillin/Sulbactam was used for antibacterial treatment and the patient improved after a week of treatment.

The isolate was identified using the VITEK MS system (bioMérieux) and conducted for whole genome sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina Inc.,). The whole genome sequence was de novo assembled using SPAdes 3.13.0 and automatically annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) server. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), and virulence genes (VGs) of the isolate were analyzed using the BacWGSTdb server. 7 , 8 , 9 Phylogenetic relationship between CDHLST and other Lmonocytogenes strains was analyzed using a core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) approaches with threshold 25 for phylogenetic analysis. 10 The cgMLST scheme is based on whole genome sequencing and over 2,000 core genome genes are included, which is essentially different from the conventional seven gene MLST strategy and ideally suited to standardize whole genome sequencing based bacterial genotyping. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using the Etest method following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Penicillin, ampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and meropenem were used in the test.

Lmonocytogenes strain CDHLST was resistant to penicillin, but susceptible to ampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and meropenem. According to the in silico MLST analysis, CDHLST belongs to sequence type (ST) 87. The whole genome sequence of CDHLST consists of 17 contigs that comprised 2,943,808 bp with a G + C content amounted to 37.9%. A total of 2,871 protein‐coding sequences, 6 rRNA genes, 54 tRNA genes and 4 ncRNA operons were identified by the PGAP server. The genome contains one CRISPR sequence (CRISPR length: 2544 bp, located in contig00003, position: 360305–362849) and several IS elements, the majority of which belong to the IS3, IS4, and IS1595 families. The ARGs and VGs of CDHLST are presented in Table 1. One fosfomycin resistance gene, fosX, and thirty virulence genes including actA, ami, aut, bsh, clpC, clpE, clpP, fbpA, gtcA, and hly were identified in CDHLST.

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence genes identified in Lmonocytogenes strain CDHLST

Antimicrobial resistance gene Contig Identity (%) Position Antimicrobial resistance category
fosX contig00009 92.56 17604..18005 fosfomycin
Virulence gene Contig Identity (%) Position Functional annotation
actA contig00008 94.1 129255..131169 actin‐assembly inducing protein precursor
ami contig00007 97.93 204526..207279 autolysin amidase, adhesin
aut contig00001 96.97 183609..185327 autolysin
bsh contig00004 97.55 44831..45808 bile salt hydrolase
clpC contig00006 94.11 2288..4750 endopeptidase Clp ATP‐binding chain C
clpE contig00001 93.38 257886..260054 ATP‐dependent protease
clpP contig00007 96.82 98739..99335 ATP‐dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit
fbpA contig00005 91.77 202054..203766 fibronectin‐binding protein
gtcA contig00007 98.63 194341..194778 wall teichoic acid glycosylation protein GtcA
hly contig00008 97.23 125599..127188 listeriolysin O precursor
hpt contig00001 97.69 416141..417526 hexose phosphate transport protein
iap/cwhA contig00001 95.87 665958..667391 P60 extracellular protein, invasion associated protein
inlA contig00006 96.55 218554..220956 Internalin A
inlB contig00006 94.98 221041..222931 Internalin B
inlC contig00005 97.08 246307..247197 internalin C
inlJ contig00003 95.07 113531..116071 internalin J
inlK contig00002 89.18 427325..429145 internalin K
inlP contig00007 95.29 100992..102158 internalin P
lap contig00002 97.27 65697..68297 Listeria adhesion protein Lap
lapB contig00002 93 20677..25833 Listeria adhesion protein LapB
lpeA contig00005 96.89 183162..184094 lipoprotein promoting cell invasion
lplA1 contig00001 92.77 317149..318144 lipoate protein ligase
lspA contig00005 97.42 187019..187483 signal peptidase II
mpl contig00008 94.72 127523..129055 Zinc metalloproteinase precursor
oatA contig00002 93.59 425406..427292 peptidoglycan O‐acetyltransferase
pdgA contig00006 97 203941..205341 Peptidoglycan N‐deacetylase
plcA contig00008 97.27 124403..125356 phosphatidylinositol‐specific phospholipase c
plcB contig00008 95.51 131211..132079 phospholipase C
prfA contig00008 97.48 123417..124130 listeriolysin positive regulatory protein
prsA2 contig00004 96.15 210112..210993 post translocation chaperone PrsA2

Phylogenetic relationship between Lmonocytogenes strain CDHLST and other Lmonocytogenes strains currently deposited in the BacWGSTdb 2.0 server was presented in Figure 1. The database currently contains 3243 Lmonocytogenes strains. A total of 60 phylogenetically related strains were identified in the database according to a threshold of 25 and the clinical metadata of these isolates are presented in Table S1. Among them, 54 strains were from China, four strains from the USA and two strains of unknown location. The 54 strains from China were distributed in 11 provinces, of which Sichuan, Beijing and Zhejiang were the most predominant. The closest relatives of Lmonocytogenes strain CDHLST are two Lmonocytogenes strain isolated from Hebei in 2005 and 2006, ICDC_LM0200 and ICDC_LM0216 (Accession No. QDCN00000000 and QDCL00000000); the sequences differ by only 9 cgMLST loci and bearing the same ARGs and VGs. The in silico MLST analysis showed that all strains, except one ST310 strain and one ST1166 strain, belonged to ST87. These ST87 Lmonocytogenes strains were epidemiologically related and have spread over different provinces in China. They have similar ARGs and VGs, and widely distributed in poultry, aquatic product, meat, cooked food, environment, feces, and even can be isolated from umbilical cord blood (Table S1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Phylogenetic relationship between CDHLST and other Lmonocytogenes strains currently deposited in the BacWGSTdb 2.0 server using a core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) approaches. The cells in different shape indicate a distinct of ST type, while the color of each cells indicates a distinct of isolate location

In summary, we report the first genome sequence of a clinical ST87 Lmonocytogenes strain isolated from a blood stream infection of an immunocompetent individual in China. Our data may help to understand the genomic features and phylogenetic characterization of this bacterial pathogen.

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number JAFIQZ000000000.

Supporting information

Table S1

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81702042), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ19H200003), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (Y202044471) and Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan (2019KY311).

Weizhong wang and Juan Xu contributed equally to this study.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data presented in the study are deposited in the GenBank repository, accession number JAFIQZ000000000. Interested readers can contact the corresponding author for further information.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Freitag NE, Port GC, Miner MD. Listeria monocytogenes–from saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(9):623‐628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Jordan K, McAuliffe O. Listeria monocytogenes in Foods. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2018;86:181‐213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Czuprynski CJ. Listeria monocytogenes: silage, sandwiches and science. Anim Health Res Rev. 2005;6(2):211‐217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Maury MM, Tsai YH, Charlier C, et al. Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat Genet. 2016;48(3):308‐313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Reddy S, Lawrence ML. Virulence characterization of Listeria monocytogenes. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1157:157‐165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Le Fevere De Ten Hove F, Reumont T. Pyogenic Ventriculitis Caused by Listeria Monocytogenes. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2020;104(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ruan Z, Feng Y. BacWGSTdb, a database for genotyping and source tracking bacterial pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D682‐687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ruan Z, Yu Y, Feng Y. The global dissemination of bacterial infections necessitates the study of reverse genomic epidemiology. Brief Bioinform. 2020;21(2):741‐750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Feng Y, Zou S, Chen H, Yu Y, Ruan Z. BacWGSTdb 2.0: a one‐stop repository for bacterial whole‐genome sequence typing and source tracking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D644‐d650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Jia H, Chen Y, Wang J, Xie X, Ruan Z. Emerging challenges of whole‐genome‐sequencing‐powered epidemiological surveillance of globally distributed clonal groups of bacterial infections, giving Acinetobacter baumannii ST195 as an example. Int J Med Microbiol. 2019;309(7):151339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in the study are deposited in the GenBank repository, accession number JAFIQZ000000000. Interested readers can contact the corresponding author for further information.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES