TABLE 5.
Results of CPD parameters on day 2 according to the AP severity. Data are shown as median (Q1; Q3)
Variable | MAP (n = 30) | MSAP (n = 42) | SAP (n = 31) | χ2 | P‐value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MN_V_NE | 150.00 (146.00; 154.75) | 154.50 (149.00; 163.75) | 161.00 (155.00; 166.50) | 16.43 | 0.001a,b,c |
SD_V_NE | 20.21 (18.29; 21.34) | 21.44 (19.58; 22.68) | 21.40 (20.18; 23.82) | 9.71 | 0.007a,c |
SD_C_NE | 6.47 (6.14; 6.94) | 6.14 (5.63; 6.59) | 5.74 (5.02; 6.16) | 13.62 | 0.001a,b |
MN_MALS_NE | 141.50 (136.00; 143.75) | 137.50 (133.00; 141.75) | 136.00 (132.50; 138.50) | 9.20 | 0.010a,c |
MN_UMALS_NE | 140.00 (138.00; 143.75) | 139.50 (136.00; 141.00) | 136.00 (134.00; 141.00) | 8.10 | 0.017a |
SD_C_LY | 12.17 (9.60; 14.35) | 11.68 (9.69; 13.78) | 13.99 (11.71; 16.06) | 7.56 | 0.022b |
SD_MALS_LY | 17.89 (16.84; 19.50) | 18.33 (16.92; 20.34) | 20.29 (19.12; 21.87) | 10.33 | 0.005a,b |
SD_UMALS_LY | 20.26 (19.39; 22.09) | 20.35 (19.25; 22.33) | 22.32 (21.64; 23.65) | 8.58 | 0.013a,b |
MN_V_MO | 168.00 (163.00; 172.75) | 169.00 (164.00; 174.00) | 176.00 (167.00; 182.00) | 8.93 | 0.011a,b |
SD_V_MO | 21.17 (19.69; 23.46) | 24.30 (21.29; 26.59) | 25.73 (23.72; 27.37) | 19.80 | 0.001a,c |
SD_AL2_MO | 13.63 (13.26; 15.01) | 15.97 (14.36; 18.28) | 17.68 (16.15; 19.40) | 30.00 | 0.001a,b,c |
Abbreviations: AL2, axial light loss; C, conductivity; CPD, cell population data; LALS, low angle light scatter; LMALS, lower median angle light scatter; LY, lymphocyte; MALS, median angle light scatter; MAP, mild acute pancreatitis; MN, mean; MO, monocyte; MSAP, moderately severe acute pancreatitis; NE, neutrophil; Q1, lower quartile; Q3, upper quartile; SAP, severe acute pancreatitis; SD, standard deviation; UMALS, upper median angle light scatter; V, volume.
Note: P‐value is reported for overall comparison between three groups (in Kruskal‐Wallis ANOVA), the letters in superscript indicate the results of post hoc tests: a significant difference between the MAP and SAP groups in post hoc comparison; b significant difference between the MSAP and SAP groups in post hoc comparison; c significant difference between the MAP and MSAP groups in post hoc comparison.