Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr-Jun;33(2):206–218. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210028

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with the choice of crystalloid or colloid for fluid resuscitation episodes in Brazilian patients

Variable Crystalloid given
OR (95%CI)
p value Colloid given
OR (95%CI)
p value
Admission characteristics        
    Operating room after elective surgery 1.0 0.215 1.0 0.1144
    Emergency room 1.0 (0.3 - 2.9)   0.6 (0.2 - 1.5)  
    Hospital floor 3.0 (0.3 - 26.8)   0.2 (0.0 - 1.2)  
    Transferred from other ICU or hospital 2.5 (0.3 - 22.6)   0.7 (0.2 - 3.1)  
    Operating room after emergency surgery 0.6 (0.1 - 2.6)   0.8 (0.2 - 2.7)  
    Hospital floor after previous ICU stay 0.3 (0.1 - 1.1)   2.4 (0.8 - 7.5)  
Fluid prescriber        
    Specialist/assistant physician 1.0     < 0.0001 1.0 0.1483
    Senior resident/fellow 9.9 (3.6 - 27.7)   0.2 (0.0 - 1.1)  
    Resident 0.6 (0.1 - 3.9)   1.4 (0.3 - 6.5)  
Metabolic acidosis        
    No 1.0 0.241 1.0 0.2207
    Yes 0.5 (0.1 - 1.8)   1.3 (0.5 - 3.4)  
    Missing 0.3 (0.1 - 1.2)   2.5 (0.9 - 7.1)  
Lactate (mmol/L) categories        
    < 2 1.0 0.394 1.0 0.8014
    ≥ 2 0.9 (0.2 - 3.5)   0.8 (0.3 - 2.1)  
    Missing 0.4 (0.1 - 1.8)   1.1 (0.4 - 3.0)  
Mean arterial pressure (per 10mmHg decrease) 1.2 (1.0 - 1.5) 0.012 0.9 (0.7 - 1.0) 0.0669
Albumin (g/L) categories        
    < 27 1.0 0.001 1.0  < 0.0001
    ≥ 27 8.6 (0.8 - 89.8)   0.2 (0.0 - 0.9)  
    Missing 7.2 (2.5 - 20.7)   0.2 (0.1 - 0.4)  

OR - odds ratio; 95%CI - 95% confidence interval; ICU - intensive care unit. The results were generated from a generalized estimating equation model with patient ID as a cluster, using two binary outcomes in the analysis: (1) crystalloid episode Yes versus crystalloid episode No, and (2) colloid episode Yes versus colloid episode No. The denominators of these two outcomes were the total number of fluid episodes; thus, a given patient could have received a crystalloid as well as a colloid within the same hour (the same fluid episode). The analysis included 844 episodes from 503 study participants, as data were lost due to missing values that could not be included in the multivariate analysis. This number represents a loss of 4.1% of episodes and 3.1% of study participants.