Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: Analyst. 2020 Aug 24;145(17):5754–5767. doi: 10.1039/d0an00746c

Table 1.

Quantum Dot Properties.

Heterostructureb PLmax (nm) FWHM (nm) ε400c (M−1 cm−1) Radiusd (nm) ΦCHCL3e (%) ΦH2Oe (%) BH2Of x103
D1 CdxZn1-xSeyS1-y 510 30 170,000 5.0 ± 0.6 30.2 ± 1.0 28.9 ± 0.3 49
D2 InP/7ZnS 560 63 360,000 2.2 ± 0.3 11.7 ± 2.5 0.7 ± 0.3 3
D3 InP/4ZnSe/3ZnS 555 61 940,000 2.0 ± 0.2 17.0 ± 1.3 4.2 ± 0.6 40
D4 InP/7ZnSe/3ZnS 560 47 2,400,000 2.3 ± 0.3 16.1 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.2 110
A1 InP/3ZnSa 650 69 1,100,000 1.7 ± 0.2 14.6 ± 0.7 1.4 ± 0.2 15
a

Used as the acceptor QD; all other samples were used as donors.

b

QD composition. The first QD is an alloyed structure that forms a CdSe/ZnS QD with an alloyed interface based on the differential reactivities of the precursor materials; remaining heterostructures formed through SILAR deposition of shells on pre-made cores. The numbers before the shell compositions indicate the number of rounds of SILAR deposition, not final yield of shelling reaction.

c

ε400 determined using published empirical equations correlating 1s peak position to cores size and ε1s to map ε to the entire QD absorption spectrum.

d

Sizing based on TEM images (n = 76–212).

e

Absolute quantum yield measurements taken with an integrating sphere.

f

QD brightness in water calculated by multiplying ε400 and ФH2O and rounding to the nearest thousand.