Table 2.
Opportunities and challenges of the online open educational resource and collaboration platform
Opportunities | Challenges | ||
---|---|---|---|
Theme - subtheme | n | Theme - subtheme | n |
To get access to resources | 25 | Language barriers | 29 |
… of high quality | 3 | Local differences | 21 |
… more up to date | 3 | … in prescribing ethics, guidelines and drug availability | 10 |
… in a greater variety | 3 | … in curricula/teaching methods | 11 |
… for free | 2 | Investment of time and money | 21 |
To get inspired | 18 | … for maintenance of the platform | 8 |
… on new teaching approaches | 5 | … difficulties obtaining funding | 4 |
… and adjust own content accordingly | 2 | … to find and adapt the resources | 4 |
To improve quality | 26 | ... costs for users | 5 |
… via specialized resources | 2 | Technological barriers | |
… by comparing to others | 5 | … the need for a very clear overview and indexation | 7 |
… via peer-reviewed resources | 2 | … compatibility issues with currently used software | 2 |
To harmonize curricula, learning goals, and teaching | 18 | …. limited availability of on-campus computers | 1 |
… in Europe | 6 | … digital resources do not fit in the current curriculum | 1 |
To contribute | 14 | Quality control | 10 |
To improve collaboration | 14 | … risk of low-quality content | 7 |
… by learning from local differences | 5 | … the requirement for quality control | 3 |
… by promoting harmonization | 4 | Problems with ownership | 5 |
… by scientifically evaluating educational resources | 3 | … copyright issues | 3 |
… by communicating about meetings and conferences | 2 | … a lack of responsibility for what is placed on the platform | 1 |
To save valuable resources | 9 | … poor return value for sharing | 1 |
Time | 6 | Dissemination problems | 2 |
Time and costs | 3 | No barriers | 10 |
Unthematized codes | … if cost-free | 3 | |
Because it is easy | 5 | Undefined codes* | 4 |
To assure sustainability | 1 | ||
To fulfil the internationalization policies of my university | 1 | ||
Due to the possibility to link w/ national drug databases | 1 | ||
Codes with reservations rather than advantages | |||
Only if it is aligned with my teaching/regional situation | 3 | ||
Only if it is better than currently available | 2 | ||
Only teachers should have access | 1 | ||
What’s the point, similar project exists | 1 |
Themes in bold; corresponding subthemes underneath. Subtheme numbers do not add up to theme total, because not every code was given a subtheme. *The following codes were not thematised because they were insufficiently understood: “Need for blended learning”, “Need to define learning goals”, “Depends on topics and subjects”, and “No practical information enough”