Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 12;13(6):e15616. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15616

Table 3. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment of Cross-sectional, Cohort and Case-control Studies.

max. = maximum

Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment
Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment of Cross-sectional Studies
Studies Selection (max. 5 stars) Comparability (max. 2 stars) Outcome (max. 3 stars) Total Score (max. 10)
Minotti et al. [12] 3 2 3 8
Kuwabara et al. [13] 4 2 3 9
Yildiran et al. [14] 3 2 3 8
Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment of Cohort Studies
Studies Selection (max. 4 stars) Comparability (max. 2 stars) Outcome (max. 3 stars) Total Score (max. 9)
Prentice et al. [15] 3 2 2 7
Huang et al. [16] 3 2 3 8
Lee et al. [17] 4 2 3 9
Eshak et al. [18] 4 2 3 9
Zhao et al. [19] 4 2 3 9
Stepaniak et al. [20] 4 2 2 8
Cangemi et al. [21] 3 2 2 7
Wannamethe et al. [22] 4 2 3 9
Espe et al. [23] 3 2 3 8
Goyal et al. [24] 3 2 3 8
Ferro et al. [25] 3 2 2 7
Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment of Case-control Studies
Llopis-González et al. [26] 4 2 2 8
Godala et al. [27] 2 2 3 7
Xu et al. [28] 2 2 3 7
Naidoo et al. [29] 4 2 2 8
Nagao [30] 4 2 2 8