Table 3.
Mean error and absolute mean error and root mean squared error and 95 % confidence intervals validating the Willems et al. (BC) method, overall and sex specific
| Sex | N | Mean | SD | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M + F | 1146 | Chronological Age | 10.31 | 4.00 | 0.6653 |
| Estimated age | 10.28 | 3.51 | |||
| Error | 0.02 | 1.78 | |||
| RMSE (95 %Cl) | 1.7780 (1.711;1.845) | – | |||
| M | 605 | Chronological Age | 10.50 | 4.04 | 0.5055 |
| Estimated age | 10.50 | 3.50 | |||
| Error | − 0.01 | 1.76 | |||
| Absolute Error | 1.34 | 1.13 | |||
| RMSE (95 %Cl) | 1.7582 (1.667;1.849) | – | |||
| F | 541 | Chronological Age | 10.09 | 3.96 | 0.1560 |
| Estimated age | 10.03 | 3.51 | |||
| Error | 0.06 | 1.80 | |||
| Absolute Error | 1.33 | 1.22 | |||
| RMSE (95 %Cl) | 1.8003 (1.700;1.900) | – |
N: Number; M: total number of male subjects; F: total number of female subjects; Descriptive statistics for chronological age based on the method by Willems et al. [11] and for the (absolute) error between chronological age and estimated age: mean age and standard deviation (SD); RMSE: root mean squared error; 95 %CI: 95 % confidence intervals for RMSE; P: p-value from Wilcoxon signed rank test comparing age and age estimation based on Willems et al. (2001) [3]