Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2020 Sep 9;110:103564. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103564

Table 3.

Classification task performance of the information extraction models: simple model, bagging model, and two partitioned bagging models. We adopted both micro- and macro-averaged F1 scores as a performance metric; micro F1 weighs on individual cases and macro F1 considers a balance of the classes.

Site Subsite Laterality
Micro F1 Macro F1 Micro F1 Macro F1 Micro F1 Macro F1
Single model
MT-CNN 0.9082 0.6312 0.6523 0.2483 0.8923 0.5087
MT-HCAN 0.9138 0.6533 0.6632 0.2614 0.8983 0.5006
Bagging model
MT-CNN 0.9127 0.6402 0.6681 0.2612 0.8980 0.5172
MT-HCAN 0.9168 0.6618 0.6724 0.2716 0.9015 0.5089
Combo 0.9177 0.6660 0.6774 0.2701 0.9022 0.5176
Partitioned bagging model A - abstention classifiers
MT-CNN 0.8992 0.6104 0.6690 0.2976 0.8982 0.5223
MT-HCAN 0.8992 0.6048 0.6595 0.2565 0.8967 0.5119
Combo 0.9034 0.6117 0.6708 0.2814 0.8992 0.5211
Partitioned bagging model B - additive preclassification
MT-CNN 0.9042 0.6301 0.6750 0.3098 0.9004 0.5349
MT-HCAN 0.9036 0.6385 0.6656 0.2677 0.8997 0.5239
Combo 0.9047 0.6317 0.6745 0.2946 0.9007 0.5326
Histology Behavior Grade
Single model
MT-CNN 0.7645 0.2601 0.9753 0.8660 0.7599 0.6274
MT-HCAN 0.7684 0.2824 0.9765 0.8713 0.7637 0.6637
Bagging model
MT-CNN 0.7754 0.2724 0.9776 0.8684 0.7727 0.6390
MT-HCAN 0.7748 0.2934 0.9779 0.8692 0.7717 0.6726
Combo 0.7815 0.2925 0.9791 0.8807 0.7787 0.6677
Partitioned bagging model A - abstention classifiers
MT-CNN 0.7793 0.3651 0.9807 0.9096 0.7857 0.6384
MT-HCAN 0.7686 0.2935 0.9777 0.8872 0.7752 0.6491
Combo 0.7821 0.3474 0.9806 0.9129 0.7869 0.6488
Partitioned bagging model B - additive preclassification
MT-CNN 0.7817 0.3664 0.9809 0.9130 0.7864 0.6482
MT-HCAN 0.7704 0.2989 0.9777 0.8852 0.7752 0.6305
Combo 0.7828 0.3488 0.9806 0.9127 0.7870 0.6419