Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 14;41(28):6006–6017. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3182-20.2021

Table 4.

Models testing interactions with age

Term A: Estimate B: Estimate
Intercept 0.583 (0.121)*** 0.508 (0.122)***
NAcc (A) | Value PE (B) 0.120 (0.063) 0.007 (0.054)
lPFC (A) | Cognitive control PE (B) −0.139 (0.057)* −0.117 (0.061)
Age 0.107 (0.087) 0.120 (0.086)
Gender −0.088 (0.171) −0.056 (0.182)
NAcc (A) | Value PE (B) × Age −0.090 (0.063) 0.004 (0.056)
lPFC (A) | Cognitive control PE (B) × Age 0.045 (0.057) 0.019 (0.062)
Variance component A: Estimate B: Estimate
Var(π0ij) 0.266 0.252
Var(π1ij) 0.033 0.006
Var(π2ij) 0.022 0.036
Fit statistic A: Statistic B: Statistic
AIC 2890.8 2896.5
BIC 2965.0 2970.7

Gender was dummy coded (0 = male; 1 = female). NAcc refers to univariate ventral striatum activity; lPFC refers to univariate lPFC activity. Var() refers to a variance component of a given random effect from the model. Results come from a multilevel logistic regression model, with log-odds of a risky choice as the dependent variable. Column A, Results from the classic model (lPFC threshold = 0.25); Column B, Results from the switchboard model (association maps). In order to be concise, differing terms for each model (any term involving a metric of brain activity) are included in the same line of the first column, separated by “|.”

*p < 0.05.

***p < 0.001.

p < 0.10.