Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;121(9):5479–5596. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00055

Figure 41.

Figure 41

Helix–turn–helix motifs in PAPs and OMF that are supposed to mediate their interaction. (A) Schematic view of the coiled coil packing within the α-helical hairpin of the PAP showing its antiparallel interface. Conserved hydrophobic residues are interacting within the a and d positions of the respective N- and C-helices (projection view looking down the hairpin helices outward from the lipoyl domain). (B) A view of the α-helical hairpin tip of AcrA (based on PDB ID 2F1M),735 highlighting the interaction positions a and d; V126 (a) and A146 (d); and Y129 (a) and Y143 (a) form heptad-pairs. (C) The RLS-motif is present at the tip of the HTH motif of the PAP hairpin. Presentation of the classic-RLS-motif as observed in the (predominantly) RND- and MacB-associated assemblies, while MFS-associated PAPs show a deviation in the second half of the motif, and the T1SS-associated PAPs only retain a positively charged residue in the front of the motif, suggesting a different association with the OMF. Consistent with the lack of cognate OMFs, the PAPs in the Gram-positive organisms do not share any recognizable RLS. (D) R1 and R2 HTH-motifs at the tip of the static (H3/H4) and mobile (H7/H8) helices of the OMFs present a loosely conserved VG(L) motif, which is suggested to interact with the connecting loop of the RLS in the PAPs. Alignments in this figure have been visualized with Espript3.795