Table 5.
Self-perceived health, self-perceived healthiness of the diet, and satisfaction with the diet as reported at t=0 and 16 weeks.
| Self-perceived health items | t=0 weeks, mean (SD) | t=16 weeks, mean (SD) | P value | ||||
| Self-perceived healtha | 4.68 (1.07) | 5.35 (1.10) | .005 | ||||
| Self-perceived healthiness of dieta | 4.50 (1.05) | 5.56 (0.96) | <.001 | ||||
| Satisfaction with dietb | 4.35 (1.39) | 5.29 (1.14) | .001 | ||||
| Consumer experiencesc | |||||||
|
|
The personalized advice helped me to improve my diet | —d | 5.7 (1.5) | — | |||
|
|
The feedback helped me to improve my diet | — | 5.4 (1.4) | — | |||
|
|
If possible I would continue taking part in this program | — | 4.7 (2.0) | — | |||
|
|
I would recommend people in my surroundings to obtain personalized advice like in this study | — | 5.0 (1.8) | — | |||
|
|
I would be willing to pay for this program | — | 2.5 (1.7) | — | |||
a7-point Likert scale, ranging from “very unhealthy” to “very healthy.”
b7-point Likert scale, ranging from “very unsatisfied” to “very satisfied.”
c7-point Likert scale, ranging from “completely disagree” to “completely agree.”
dConsumer experiences were only assessed at the end of the study (t=16).