Table 3.
Summary of systematic literature review results.
| Reference | Outcome | Results | SMS messages sent, N | Response rate (%) | Compliance |
| Anthony et al [32] | Effective | Highest pain level within first 48 h; average use of 15.9 prescription opioids | ~19 | 88.3 | IRBa/HIPAAb |
| Anthony et al [33] | Effective | Response rate, pain, and medication intake decline over time | ~22 | 87.5 | IRB/HIPAA |
| Booth et al [36] | Positive impact | Rate especially powerful compared to traditional methods | ~400 | 82.0 | IRB |
| Brix et al [35] | Positive and efficient | Nonsignificant trend for better adherence | ~8 | n/ac | n/a |
| Carrier et al [37] | Positive impact | Intervention led to earlier detection | 16 | 89.5 | n/a |
| Chen et al [38] | Positive impact | Real-time monitoring possible | 14 | 88.0 | n/a |
| Day et al [39] | Positive impact | High satisfaction rate, high adherence and acceptance among patients | ~18 | n/a | IRB |
| Nelson et al [40] | Positive impact | Less medication intake, pain decreased daily | ~20 | 88.4 | IRB/HIPAA |
| Newton and Sulman [41] | Positive impact | Improved adherence and communication quality, less anxiety, positive educational effect | 12 | n/a | n/a |
| Premkumar et al [42] | Positive impact | Real-time, highly accepted, and available data collection method | ~80 | 96.1 | n/a |
| Yahanda et al [34] | Positive impact | Improved adherence and satisfaction | ~18 | n/a | IRB |
aIRB: institutional review board.
bHIPAA: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
cn/a: not available; the article does not provide corresponding information.