Table 7.

Comparison with state-of-the-art approaches.

Method	Percent accuracy
Jaiswal et. al. [58]	96.25
Soares et. al. [24]	97.38
Wang et. al. [59]	90.83
Silva et. al. [60]	98.50
Goel et. al. [61]	97.78
$\mathbf{CHHO\; +\; SA}$	98.85