Table 1.
Levels of evidence and recommended grades
Definition | ||
---|---|---|
Level of evidence | ||
A | There is good research-based evidence to support the recommendation. Data derived from at least 1 randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis or systematic review |
|
B | There is fair research-based evidence to support the recommendation. Data derived from at least 1 well designed cohort or case-control study without randomization |
|
C | There is fair evidence but it is insufficient to support the recommendation. Data derived from case series or observational studies |
|
D | The recommendation is based on expert opinion and panel consensus. Consensus of expert opinions based on experience |
|
Recommended grade | ||
Class I | The recommendation is supported by level of evidence A. Clinically important outcomes and the study population is representative of the population in the recommendation. |
Is recommended |
Class IIa | The recommendation is supported by level of evidence B. Clinically important or validated surrogate outcomes. |
Should be considered |
Class IIb | The recommendation is supported by level of evidence C or D. The outcome is an unvalidated surrogate condition but clinically important outcomes. |
May be considered |
Class III | The recommendation is supported by level of evidence C or D. Outcome is an unvalidated surrogate for clinically important population, or the applicability of the study is irrelevant. |
Is not recommended |
Data from Schünemann et al.3