Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 26;23(4):604–613. doi: 10.1007/s11307-021-01581-5

Table 2.

Shortened time intervals interpolated using four different methods are compared with plasma input DVR-1 and SRTM BPND obtained with the original scan duration

DVR-1 (0–60/80–130) SRTM BPND (0–60/80–130)
HC AD HC AD
r2 Slope r2 Slope r2 Slope r2 Slope
POP-IP 2T4k_VB SRTM BPND (0–50/80–100) 0.96 0.96 0.91 1.01 0.98 1.04 0.99 0.93
SRTM BPND (0–40/80–100) 0.95 0.96 0.91 0.99 0.98 1.03 0.99 0.91
SRTM BPND (0–30/80–100) 0.93 0.94 0.92 0.97 0.96 1.02 0.98 0.89
Cubic SRTM BPND (0–50/80–100) 0.96 0.94 0.91 1.01 0.99 1.02 0.99 0.93
SRTM BPND (0–40/80–100) 0.96 0.95 0.91 0.98 0.99 1.02 0.99 0.90
SRTM BPND (0–30/80–100) 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.85
Linear SRTM BPND (0–50/80–100) 0.96 0.93 0.91 0.98 0.99 1.02 0.99 0.90
SRTM BPND (0–40/80–100) 0.96 0.95 0.91 0.92 0.98 1.03 0.99 0.84
SRTM BPND (0–30/80–100) 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.84 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.76
Exponential SRTM BPND (0–50/80–100) 0.96 0.94 0.91 1.01 0.99 1.02 0.99 0.93
SRTM BPND (0–40/80–100) 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.97 0.98 1.04 0.98 0.90
SRTM BPND (0–30/80–100) 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.92 0.96 0.99 0.97 0.85

The correspondence of SRTM BPND with DVR-1 for the original scan duration was r2 = 0.96, slope = 0.90 for HC, and r2 = 0.93, slope = 1.09 for AD subjects