Table 4.
Multiple Linear Regression for Predictors of Social Media Usage from the Parent Perspective Using LASSO-penalized Variable Selection
Bootstrapped LASSO Parameter Estimates |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Outcome and Predictor Variables* |
Mean Estimate |
SD | 95% CI | Standardized Estimate |
Adjusted R2 |
Social Media Usage (overall sample) | 0.302 | ||||
Intercept | 11.103 | 1.226 | 8.715 to 13.266 | 0 | |
QIDS-C Total | 0.176 | 0.101 | 0.021 to 0.391 | 0.169 | |
Cyberbullying Score | 0.144 | 0.081 | 0.041 to 0.321 | 0.126 | |
Group (MDD vs. normal controls) | 2.551 | 1.474 | 0.332 to 5.956 | 0.223 | |
Salivary Cortisol | 10.221 | 5.175 | 2.868 to 22.711 | 0.096 | |
Social Media Usage (MDD sample) | 0.134 | ||||
Intercept | 16.294 | 1.839 | 12.220 to 19.338 | 0 | |
Salivary Cortisol | 18.166 | 7.381 | 7.501 to 34.961 | 0.266 | |
Social Media Usage (Healthy Control Sample) | – | ||||
Intercept | 12.921 | 0.822 | 11.333 to 14.633 | 0 |
Note. The LASSO estimates were based on 10,000 bootstrap samples of the model; Mean Estimate = bootstrap parameter estimate (regression coefficient); SD = standard deviation of the mean parameter estimate; 95% CI for the mean parameter estimate; For the 95% CI that does not contain zero (0), the respective mean parameter estimate is statistically significant at alpha = 0.05 (two-tailed); Standardized Estimate = bootstrap standardized regression coefficient; Adjusted R-squared is the model R-squared based on the LASSO-penalized variable selection; Observed sample: N=60 for the overall sample, n = 30 for the MDD subgroup and n = 30 for the normal control subgroup.
Social media usage was assessed using the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), which is 6-item scale that measures risk of social media addiction over the past year. Total score on the BSMAS ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores representing greater risk of social media addiction.
Predictor variables were selected from a pool of 9 potential predictor variables via the LASSO-penalized variable selection method (which performs simultaneous variable selection and parameter estimation) in the context of a multiple linear regression model that was based on 10,000 bootstrap samples.
No significant predictors emerged in the normal control sample.