Table 2.
Determination of methanol in fruit and vegetable beverages by the proposed method and reference method.
Sample | Added (mM) | This work | GC-FIDa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Found ± SD (mM) | Recovery (%) | Found (mM) | Recovery (%) | ||
Apple juice | 0 | ND | – | ND | – |
5 | 5.06 ± 0.08 | 101 | 4.93 | 99 | |
10 | 10.54 ± 0.10 | 105 | 9.71 | 97 | |
Tomato juice | 0 | ND | – | ND | – |
5 | 5.10 ± 0.01 | 102 | 4.93 | 99 | |
10 | 10.63 ± 0.09 | 106 | 10.21 | 102 | |
Orange juice | 0 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | – | 0.92 | – |
5 | 5.88 ± 0.11 | 100 | 5.93 | 100 | |
10 | 10.87 ± 0.03 | 100 | 11.61 | 106 | |
Pineapple juice | 0 | 1.72 ± 0.01 | – | 1.70 | – |
5 | 6.79 ± 0.01 | 101 | 6.73 | 100 | |
10 | 11.75 ± 0.10 | 100 | 11.68 | 100 | |
Green tea | 0 | ND | – | ND | – |
5 | 4.98 ± 0.01 | 100 | 5.25 | 105 | |
10 | 10.18 ± 0.01 | 102 | 10.33 | 103 | |
Coffee | 0 | ND | – | ND | – |
5 | 5.02 ± 0.07 | 100 | 5.03 | 101 | |
10 | 10.17 ± 0.01 | 102 | 9.93 | 99 | |
Malt beverage | 0 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | – | 0.88 | – |
5 | 5.82 ± 0.01 | 99 | 5.91 | 101 | |
10 | 10.89 ± 0.01 | 100 | 11.14 | 102 | |
Pickled ginger | 0 | ND | – | ND | – |
5 | 4.98 ± 0.01 | 100 | 5.22 | 104 | |
10 | 10.18 ± 0.01 | 102 | 10.12 | 101 | |
Pickled mustard | 0 | 0.52 ± 0.00 | – | 0.53 | – |
5 | 5.58 ± 0.00 | 101 | 5.65 | 102 | |
10 | 10.54 ± 0.07 | 100 | 10.67 | 101 | |
Pickled lettuce | 0 | 0.95 ± 0.05 | – | 0.92 | – |
5 | 5.95 ± 0.01 | 100 | 6.17 | 104 | |
10 | 10.97 ± 0.07 | 100 | 10.86 | 99 |
aFood Research and Testing Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University.