Table 2.

Spearman correlation matrix.

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. Mixed land use**	1.00	0.38*	0.15	0.02	–0.28*	–0.20*	−012	−0.15	0.00	−0.08
2. Walking hazard**		1.00	0.04	0.14	–0.21*	0.05	−0.16	0.06	0.13	0.07
3. Pedestrian safety**			1.00	0.34*	–0.20*	−0.09	−0.04	−0.17	−0.10	0.10
4 Perceived crime**				1.00	−0.10	0.06	0.10	−0.15	−0.12	−0.10
5. FL					1.00	0.21*	−0.05	0.26*	0.27*	0.16
6 Fall in the past year						1.00	0.13	0.32*	0.23*	0.34*
7 Vision problems							1.00	0.11	0.11	0.03
8 Numbness in Feet								1.00	0.12	0.29*
9.Medication, > 3/day									1.00	0.21*
10. Body mass index										1.00
Skewedness	0.25	−0.02	−0.14	−0.18	−0.82	0.19	0.42	0.36	−1.15	0.99
Kurtosis	−0.90	−0.71	−0.94	−1.29	−1.35	−2.00	−1.85	−1.90	−0.67	1.28

The demographic variables did not indicate the statistically significant relationships with the dependent variables at p = 0.05 level; SD, Standard deviation; FL, functional limitation;

^*a statistically significant level at p = 0.05;

^**higher scores of neighborhoods walkability indicated the perception of greater mixed-land-use, fewer walking hazards, greater pedestrian safety and little crime. Bold values indicates a statistically significant level at p = 0.05.