Table 1.
category | model class | tested variable | N | χ2 | p-value | marginal R2 | conditional R2 | 95% CI |
effect size (Cohen's d) | F versus M | figure | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lower | upper | |||||||||||||
behaviour | Gaussian | time spent in cleaning resident clients | sex | 8 F and 8 M | 3.588 | 0.058 | 0.129 | 0.463 | −70.1 | 1.19 | 0.81 | F ≥ M | figure 2a | |
Gaussian | time spent in cleaning visitor clients | sex | 8 F and 8 M | 1.466 | 0.226 | 0.021 | 0.782 | −109 | 25.70 | 0.32 | F = M | figure 2a | ||
Gaussian | total interactions with resident clients | sex | 8 F and 8 M | 3.000 | 0.083 | 0.118 | 0.410 | −20.9 | 1.29 | 0.76 | F = M | figure 2b | ||
Gaussian | total interactions with visitor clients | sex | 8 F and 8 M | 1.428 | 0.232 | 0.023 | 0.758 | −0.80 | 0.19 | 0.56 | F = M | figure 2b | ||
Gaussian | jolts rate by resident clients | sex | 8 F and 8 M | 4.518 | 0.033 | 0.125 | 0.585 | −37.8 | −1.53 | 0.80 | F > M | figure 2c | ||
Gaussian | jolts rate by visitor clients | sex | 8 F and 8 M | 1.617 | 0.203 | 0.065 | 0.393 | −10.2 | 2.17 | 0.55 | F = M | figure 2c | ||
cognition | learning abilities | Poisson | reversal-learning task | sex | 10 F and 9 M | 13.067 | <0.001 | 0.155 | 0.794 | −0.35 | −0.10 | — | F < M | figure 3a |
binomial | client quality task | sex | 10 F and 10 M | 5.519 | 0.019 | 0.411 | 0.631 | 0.79 | 6.68 | — | F < M | figure 3b | ||
inhibitory control abilities | Gaussian | detour task | sex | 10 F and 10 M | 14.476 | <0.001 | 0.157 | 0.794 | −0.20 | −0.07 | 0.91 | F > M | figure 4a | |
Gaussian | audience effect task | sex | 10 F and 10 M | 0.122 | 0.727 | 0.050 | 0.282 | −0.26 | 0.26 | 0.09 | F = M | figure 4b | ||
audience treatment | 10 F and 10 M | 2.475 | 0.116 | −0.38 | 0.15 | 0.46 | — | figure 4b | ||||||
sex × audience treatment | 10 F and 10 M | 0.122 | 0.727 | −0.44 | 0.31 | — | F = M | figure 4b |