Table 4.
Estimate | 95% CI | Cohen’s d | |
---|---|---|---|
Within-person coupling effects | |||
(ANX)[ΔT-1] ➔ Δ(EF)[ΔT] | −0.254 | [−0.951, 0.444] | −0.068 |
(EF)[ΔT-1] ➔ Δ(ANX)[ΔT] | −0.254 | [−0.951, 0.444] | −0.068 |
Within-person proportional effects | |||
(ANX)[ΔT-1] ➔ Δ(ANX)[ΔT] | 0.006 | [−0.597, 0.608] | 0.002 |
(EF)[ΔT-1] ➔ Δ(EF)[ΔT] | 0.080** | [0.025, 0.135] | 0.274 |
Between-person covariances | |||
(ANX)[T-1] ↔ Δ(ANX)[ΔT] | −0.049*** | [−0.077, −0.021] | −0.336 |
(EF)[T-1] ↔ Δ(EF)[ΔT] | −0.014 | [−0.044, 0.016] | −0.090 |
(EF)[T-1] ↔ Δ(ANX)[T-1] | −0.101*** | [−0.144, −0.058] | −0.441 |
(EF)[ΔT] ↔ Δ(ANX)[ΔT] | −0.007 | [−0.017, 0.002] | −0.134 |
(ANX)[T-1] ↔ Δ(EF)[ΔT] | 0.007 | [−0.016, 0.030] | 0.056 |
(EF)[T-1] ↔ Δ(ANX)[ΔT] | 0.031 | [−0.016, 0.078] | 0.124 |
(EF)[T] ↔ Δ(ANX)[T] | 0.004 | [−0.009, 0.018] | 0.055 |
Between-person intercepts | |||
Mean of (ANX)[T1] | 0.224*** | [0.178, 0.270] | 0.935 |
Mean of Δ(ANX)[T] | −0.052 | [−0.155, 0.051] | −0.096 |
Mean of (EF)[T1] | 0.003 | [−0.055, 0.061] | 0.010 |
Mean of Δ(EF)[T] | −0.102*** | [−0.136, −0.068] | −0.576 |
Variances | |||
Variance of (ANX)[T1] | 0.231* | [0.056, 0.407] | 0.246 |
Residuals of Δ(ANX)[T] | 0.256*** | [0.138, 0.374] | 0.410 |
Variance of Δ(ANX)[T] | 0.000 | – | – |
Variance of (EF)[T1] | 0.692*** | [0.642, 0.742] | 2.657 |
Residuals of Δ(EF)[T] | 0.071*** | [0.058, 0.084] | 0.974 |
Variance of Δ(EF)[T] | 0.000 | – | – |
Note: Model fit indices: χ2(df = 25) = 46.996, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.966, RMSEA = 0.057, 95% CI [0.044, 0.071]. Within-person coupling effects refer to change (Δ) in ANX at a prior time-lag (ΔT-1) predicting (➔) future Δ in EF at the next adjacent time-lag (ΔT; and vice versa). Within-person coupling effects and proportional effects, residual covariances between ANX and EF, as well as variances of ANX and EF were each uniquely fixed to be equal across all three time-lags.
Abbreviations: ANX, anxiety severity; CI, confidence interval; EF, executive functioning.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.