Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;5(6):e25808. doi: 10.2196/25808

Table 3.

Mixed methods evaluation of program components (n=19).

Component Most helpfula, n (%) Least helpful, n (%) Helpful aspects Areas to improve
Practices 12 (63) 0 (0)
  • Having narrator-guided practices

  • Specific practices, spanning CBTb and mindfulness deemed helpful

  • Included 3-minute reset, breathing, mindfulness, self-compassion, establishing boundaries, and thought record

  • Usability issues such as loss of progress if interrupted (or exiting app) while practicing

  • Desire for chimes or signals when practices end (too much silence)

  • Need for more introductory practices for certain components (eg, self-compassion)

  • Clearer option to skip reflection questions after practices

Therapist Support 7 (37) 2 (11)
  • Therapist was caring, thoughtful, genuine, and supportive

  • Provided helpful feedback and comments on participant entries

  • Helped personalize the program by providing additional information and resources when necessary

  • Unclear how frequently to interact with therapist

  • Unclear how much information to share with therapist

Information Provided 4 (21) 2 (11)
  • Education and information about mood and thinking patterns

  • Provides underlying rationale for CBT and mindfulness practices

  • One participant requested practices to help differentiate rumination from reflection concerning thought boundaries.

Group 0 (0) 15 (79)
  • Reading others’ responses helped people feel less alone and feel validated in their struggles.

  • Confusion about how to use the group and need for guidelines

  • Low rates of participants using group

  • Limited response options (preprogrammed drop-down) to other members’ comments

aThree individuals ranked more than 1 component as most helpful; 1 person did not select the most helpful component.

bCBT: cognitive behavioral therapy.