Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Mach Learn Res. 2015;16(13):417–453.

Table 3:

Performance of different regularization methods in estimating graphical Granger causality with misspecified groups (30% misspecification); d = 2, T = 10, SNR = 2. Precision (P), Recall (R), MCC are given in percentages (numbers in parentheses give standard deviations). ERR LAG gives the error associated with incorrect estimation of VAR order.

p = 60, ∣E∣ = 246
Group Size=6
p = 120, ∣E∣ = 968
Group Size=6
n 160 110 60 160 110 60
P Lasso 88(2) 85(3) 77(5) 59(1) 55(1) 49(2)
Grp 65(2) 66(2) 66(3) 43(3) 44(4) 38(4)
Thgrp 87(3) 88(3) 85(3) 56(6) 56(6) 51(7)
Agrp 65(2) 66(2) 66(3) 45(2) 45(4) 39(4)
R Lasso 80(3) 63(3) 37(2) 66(1) 54(1) 35(1)
Grp 100(0) 98(2) 82(6) 87(2) 78(3) 59(4)
Thgrp 100(0) 98(2) 79(6) 86(2) 79(3) 57(4)
Agrp 100(0) 98(2) 82(6) 86(2) 78(3) 58(3)
MCC Lasso 84(2) 73(2) 53(3) 62(1) 54(1) 41(1)
Grp 81(1) 80(2) 74(4) 61(2) 58(3) 47(2)
Thgrp 93(2) 93(2) 82(4) 69(4) 66(4) 53(3)
Agrp 81(1) 80(2) 74(4) 62(2) 59(2) 47(2)
ERR Lasso 12.63 17.05 22.41 45.09 49.68 53.4
LAG Grp 9.43 8.78 15.12 18.22 18.43 29.26
Thgrp 6.45 5.34 8.02 11.81 12.84 15.57
Agrp 9.11 8.78 14.96 16.32 16.9 27.69