Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;8(4):426–440. doi: 10.1093/nop/npab026

Table 1.

Summary of Clinical and Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Studies

Source Study Design Quality of Evidencea Risk of Biasb Intervention Patients, No. Age, y Median (Range) KPS, Median (Range) Male, n (%) Recurrence Number Daily Compliance, %(range)
Newly diagnosed GBM
Kirson et al. 2009 P 3 6 Stars TTF + TMZ 10 50 (32-70) 90 (80-100) 8 (80)
TMZ 32c
Stupp et al. 2017 (EF-14) RCT 2 Some Concern TTF + TMZ 466 56 (19-83) 90 (60-100) 316 (68) 75% of pt. ≥18 h/d
TMZ 229 57 (19-80) 90 (70-100) 157 (69)
Lu et al. 2019 R 3 7 Stars TTF + TBI 8
TTF + BBC 12
Lazaridis et al. 2020 R 3 TTF + CCNU + TMZ 16 50 (27-70) 90 (60-100) 9 (66) 83 (45-99)
Song et al. 2020 P 3 TTF + TMZ + RT 10 61 (49-73) 90 (70-90) 8 (80) Concurrent phase 83.5 (49-93) Maintenance phase 77 (15-94)
Bokstein et al. 2020 P 3 TTF + TMZ + RT 10 60.2 (42-72) 90 (80-100) 8 (80) RT: 79.3 (SD 8.36) First 3 months: 77.0 (SD 10.56)
Shi et al. 2020 R 3 6 Stars TTFd 5887 <18: 0.3% 18-64: 69% ≥65: 30.7% 3849 (65.4)
Recurrent GBM
Kirson et al. 2007 P 3 6 Stars TTF 10 53 (28-68) 90 (70-100) 7 (70) Mean 18h/d
Stupp et al. 2012 (EF-11) RCT 2 Some Concern TTF 120 54 (24-80) 80 (50-100) 92 (77) 1st: 9% 2nd: 48% ≥3rd: 43% 86 (41-98)
BSC 117 54 (29-74) 80 (50-100) 73 (62) 1st: 15% 2nd: 46% ≥3rd: 39%
Mrugala et al. 2014 (PRiDe) R 3 6 Stars TTFd 457 55 (18-86) 80 (10-100) 310 (67.6) 1st: 33.3% 2nd: 26.9% ≥3rd: 27.4% Unknown: 12.5% 70 (12-99)
BSC 117 54 (29-74) 80 (50-100) 73 (62) 1st: 15% 2nd: 46% ≥3rd: 39%
Wong et al. 2015 R 3 6 Stars TTF + BEV 34 57 (30-77) 70 (50-90) 21 (62) 1st: 17.6% 2nd: 26.5% ≥3rd: 55.9% 83.5
TTF + BEV + TCCC 3 56 (51-56) 70 (60-70) 2 (66) 1st: 0% 2nd: 66.6% ≥3rd: 33.3% 66.7
Mahadevan et al. 2015 R 3 6 Stars TTF ± SRS 40 57 (47-79) 24 (60)
Ansstas et al. 2016 R 4 TTF 8 51 (35-62) 5 (62.5) 3rd: 87.5% 4th: 12.5% 74.2 (48.2-92.9)
Kesari et al. 2017 (EF-14) RCT-PH 2 Some Concern TTF + TMZ 144 57 (29-83) 90 (60-100) 108 (75) 1st: 100%
TMZ 60 58 (22-75) 90 (70-100) 45 (75) 1st: 100%
Lu et al. 2019 R 3 7 Stars TTF + TBI 18 57.8 (11.6)e 12 (66.7)
TTF + BBC 30 52.3 (9.9)e 19 (63.3)
Korshoej et al. 2019 P 3 TTF + SR Surgery 15 57 (39-67) ≥70 11 (73) 1st: 100% 90 (48-98)
Onken et al. 2019 O 3 6 Stars TTF + BSC 30 52 (36-64) 20 (67) ndGBM:47% 1st: 53% 1st month: 83 (40-97) 2nd month: 85 (56-97)
BSC 27 47e 19 (70) ndGBM: 100%
Zhu et al. 2020 (EF-19) P 3 6 Stars TTF 192 80 (9.83)e 55.9 (12.2)e 125 (65)
BSC 117 80 (11.01)e 53 (10.77)e 73 (62) 1st: 15% 2nd: 46% ≥3rd: 39%
Fallah et al. 2020 P 3 7 Stars TTF + BEV 23 60 (17-78) 18 (78)
Shi et al. 2020 R 3 6 Stars TTFd 4345 <18: 0.5% 18-64: 76.8% ≥65: 22.7% 2921 (67.2)

Abbreviations: P, prospective; R, retrospective; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RCT-PH, post hoc analysis of RCT; O, observational study; TTF, Tumor-Treating Fields; TMZ, temozolomide; BSC, best standard of care; BEV, bevacizumab; TCCC, 6-thioguanine + lomustine + capecitabine + celecoxib; BBC, bevacizumab ± irinotecan or lomustine; TBI, temozolomide + bevacizumab + irinotecan; RT, radiotherapy; SR Surgery, skull-remodeling surgery; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery.

aLevel of evidence according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines.

bRCTs: according to RoB 2 scale; non-RCTs: according to Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool.

cHistorical control, matched on KPS and age.

dPatients may have received combination therapy in addition to TTFields.

eMean (SD).