Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 May 12;86:105372. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105372

Table 6:

Ligament strains and ATS force for all specimens (n = 16) with pairwise Wilcoxon P-values between each ligament state.

Ligament Type Number of Specimens Peak ACL Strain (%) P-value vs. Native ACL P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT ACL Strain @ IC (%) P-value vs. Native ACL P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT
Native ACL 4 20.3 (11.6, 24.5) --- 0.31 0.22 0.31 15.6 (4.6, 16.8) --- 0.19 0.22 0.47
BTB 4 13.5 (4.2, 18.7) 0.31 --- 0.86 0.06 4.1 (0.7, 11.8) 0.19 --- 0.86 0.31
HT 4 11.9 (6.2, 17.0) 0.22 0.86 --- 0.05* 5.3 (0.0, 7.7) 0.22 0.86 --- 0.38
QT 4 24.8 (19.6, 31.3) 0.31 0.06 0.05* --- 8.3 (3.3, 14.2) 0.47 0.31 0.38 ---
Ligament Type Number of Specimens Peak ATS (N) P-value vs. Native P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT Peak ATS @ IC (N) P-value vs. Native P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT
Native ACL 4 768 (518, 1213) --- 0.67 0.38 0.47 75 (39, 424) --- 0.47 0.06 0.11
BTB 4 634 (570, 744) 0.67 --- 0.38 0.89 25 (−7, 106) 0.47 --- 0.99 0.99
HT 4 532 (255, 701) 0.38 0.38 --- 0.38 25 (22, 29) 0.06 0.99 --- 0.86
QT 4 693 (495, 761) 0.47 0.89 0.38 --- 23 (5, 84) 0.11 0.99 0.86 ---
*

Indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).