Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 May 12;86:105372. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105372

Table 7:

Ligament strains and ATS force for only those specimens that experienced graft substance failures (n = 11) with pairwise Wilcoxon P-values between each ligament state. Specimens with isolated fixation failure were not included in this analysis.

Ligament Type Number of Specimens Graft Failures Peak ACL Strain (%) P-value vs. Native ACL P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT Graft Failures ACL Strain @ IC (%) P-value vs. Native ACL P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT
Native ACL 4 20.3 (11.6, 24.5) --- 0.38 0.25 0.25 15.6 (4.6, 16.8) --- 0.22 0.49 0.82
BTB 3 9.5 (2.5, 19.1) 0.38 --- 0.99 0.15 1.2 (0.6, 13.3) 0.22 --- 0.77 0.39
HT 2 11.6 (6.2, 17.0) 0.25 0.99 --- 0.25 6.5 (5.3, 7.7) 0.49 0.77 --- 0.25
QT 2 28.1 (23.3, 33.0) 0.25 0.15 0.25 --- 12.6 (9.3, 15.9) 0.82 0.39 0.25 ---
Ligament Type Number of Specimens Graft Failures Peak ATS (N) P-value vs. Native P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT Graft Failures Peak ATS @ IC (N) P-value vs. Native P-value vs. BTB P-value vs. HT P-value vs. QT
Native ACL 4 768 (518, 1213) --- 0.86 0.49 0.99 75 (39, 424) --- 0.86 0.11 0.49
BTB 3 672 (562, 769) 0.86 --- 0.78 0.39 47 (2, 126) 0.86 --- 0.77 0.99
HT 2 478 (255, 701) 0.49 0.78 --- 0.25 27 (25, 29) 0.11 0.77 --- 0.99
QT 2 754 (740, 769) 0.99 0.39 0.25 --- 61 (19, 103) 0.49 0.99 0.99 ---
*

Indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).