Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;7:20595131211029206. doi: 10.1177/20595131211029206

Table 5.

Summary of outcomes.

Author, year Scar type Tape type used Duration of wear Incidence of irritation Outcome measure used Patient satisfaction details Scar outcome
Atkinson et al., 2005 Linear / hypertrophic MicroporeTM 12 weeks 4/34 0.12% Ultrasound
Scar Classification Scale (Mustoe)
Not reported None of the treatment group developed HTS on completion of 12 weeks
12 patients (41%) developed HTS in control
HTS after tape removal: 1/39
Stretched scars after tape removal: 3/39
Daya, 2011 Hypertrophic / keloid MicroporeTM Different for all depending on follow-up adherence 2/29 (0.006%) Modified POSAS
Scar appearance (photographic score)
Not reported Pain reduction*
Itch reduction*
Thickness reduction*
69% decrease in scar elevation*
29% no change in scar
Reduced scar redness, height and shine on study completion
Karwacińska et al., 2012 Hypertrophic / keloid Kinesio tapes 12 weeks Not reported Thickness: digital calliper
Patient satisfaction
Personal observations (author)
Colour change
Change in appearance and scar perception after 3 weeks (37 patients),
6 weeks (10 patients),
9 weeks (5 patients),
12 weeks (2 patients)
77% reported 100% satisfaction
(All subjective parameters)
Height: 50% reduced height
Colour: 40% significant change
Scar tissue mobility: 33% had 50% improvement, 27% had 100% improvement
Kim et al., 2015 Linear Leukosan Skin Link™ tape AND Steri Strips™ 10 days then Steri Strips™ for 3 months 1/77
(0.012%)
POSAS
Patient satisfaction
Procedure times
Taping group more satisfied on 4-point scale (3.19/4) Both groups scored POSAS ~20/60
Procedure time shorter*
Lin et al., 2020 Linear Steri Strips™ 12 weeks Not reported VSS
VAS
Significantly better scar appearance than tape at 6 and 12 months, no differences between pain and itch No statistically significant differences found at 3 and 12 months with respect to pliability, height, vascularity and pigmentation
Keloid or HTS did not change outcomes on the VSS or VAS
Rosengren et al., 2013 Linear Leukosan Skin Link™ tape 2 weeks 1/63 (0.015%) Scar width, elevation, depression and colouration
Scar appearance
Patient satisfaction
Subjective scar assessment same in both groups at 6 months
Very satisfied 43.1% (taped group)
Overall scar rating*
Median scar width was 1 mm narrower when taped*
Sawada et al., 1998 Hypertrophic / post grafting Blenderm™ 4–6 months, mean = 5.2 months Mild plaster dermatitis to surrounding normal skin, no % reported Scar pigmentation, hardness, bulkiness, wrinkles and shrinkage Not reported (All subjective parameters)
Reported at 18 months
Pigmentation: 100% improvement
‘Hardness’: 55% improvement
3 participants were noted to have improvement in bulkiness, less ‘wrinkles’ and shrinkage (graft became less contracted)
Toscano et al., 2016 Hypertrophic / post grafting Kinesio tape 7 months No adverse effects ROM
Photographic assessment
Scar colour, extensibility, pliability, pain, and dysesthesia
Good patient compliance noted Faster change in scar colour during remodelling phase ‘ripening phase’
Pliability increase, colour improved, pain resolved, tension and hypertrophy reduced, resolution of hypersensitivity, increased functional ROM
Widgerow et al., 2009 Linear MicroporeTM 3–6 months Nil POSAS
VSS
Not reported Scars demonstrated borderline significance with respect to stiffness, thickness, and regularity
No patients developed HTS
*

Statistically significant result.

Not statistically significant.

POSAS scores closer to 0 are deemed a more appealing scar.

HTS, hypertrophic scarring; POSAS, Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale; VAS, visual analogue scale; VSS, Vancouver Scar Scale.