Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 3;2016(2):CD011521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011521.pub2

Comparison 1. Duodenum‐preserving pancreatic resection versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Short‐term mortality 5 269 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.89 [0.31, 26.87]
2 Long‐term mortality 4 229 Hazard Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.31, 1.34]
3 Quality of life (3 months to 5 years)     Other data No numeric data
4 Quality of life (> 5 years) 2 101 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 8.45 [‐0.27, 17.18]
5 Adverse events (proportion) 4 226 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.22, 1.35]
6 Adverse events (number of adverse events) 1   Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
7 Length of hospital stay     Other data No numeric data
8 Employed 4 189 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.54 [1.00, 2.37]
9 New‐onset diabetes 5 269 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.50, 1.22]
10 Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency 4 189 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.68, 1.02]