Mahon 2005.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial | |
Participants | Country: United Kingdom Number randomised: 217 Post‐randomisation drop‐outs: 51 (23.5%) Revised sample size: 166 Average age: 48 years Females: not stated Barretts oesophagus: not stated Hiatus hernia: not stated Body mass index: not stated Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1: surgery (n = 80) Further details: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication Group 2: medical treatment (n = 86) Further details: Proton pump inhibitor adjusted to symptom control. | |
Outcomes | The outcomes reported were health‐related quality of life and gastrointestinal quality of life. | |
Notes | Reasons for post‐randomisation drop‐outs: Lost‐to follow‐up. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: This information was not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: This information was not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: Patients undergoing medical treatment did not have sham surgery. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: This information was not available. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: There were post‐randomisation drop‐outs. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: Treatment‐related complications were not reported adequately. |
Other bias | High risk | Quote: "This study was funded partly by Janssen Pharmaceuticals relating to physiology studies at the Norfolk Physiology Laboratory in conjunction with their GI Partnership Scheme. Yvette Sharpe performed most of these studies under the supervision of R.L. B.D., D.M. and B. K. were funded partly by Ethicon Endosurgery, UK". |
GERD or GORD = gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease PPI = proton pump inhibitor