Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;12:658843. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.658843

Table 3.

The performance of different methods for distinguishing between ATB and HC.

Methods Cutoff value AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) Accuracy
CD4+ T cell number (/μl) 404 0.768 (0.675-0.862) 57.41% (44.16%-69.67%) 85.00% (73.89%-91.90%) 77.50% (62.50%-87.69%) 68.92% (57.66%-78.31%) 3.83 (2.01-7.29) 0.5 (0.36-0.7) 71.93%
CD8+ T cell number (/μl) 203 0.661 (0.558-0.764) 35.19% (23.82%-48.52%) 90.00% (79.85%-95.34%) 76.00% (56.57%-88.51%) 60.67% (50.29%-70.18%) 3.52 (1.52-8.16) 0.72 (0.58-0.89) 64.04%
NK cell number (/μl) 156 0.877 (0.809-0.945) 68.52% (55.26%-79.32%) 95.00% (86.30%-98.29%) 92.50% (80.14%-97.42%) 77.03% (66.25%-85.13%) 13.7 (4.48-41.9) 0.33 (0.22-0.49) 82.46%
B cell number (/μl) 93 0.632 (0.525-0.738) 38.89% (27.04%-52.21%) 85.00% (73.89%-91.90%) 70.00% (52.12%-83.34%) 60.71% (50.02%-70.47%) 2.59 (1.3-5.16) 0.72 (0.57-0.91) 63.16%
HLA-DR+CD3+ T cells (%) 24.7 0.625 (0.517-0.733) 40.74% (28.68%-54.03%) 85.00% (73.89%-91.90%) 70.97% (53.41%-83.91%) 61.45% (50.69%-71.19%) 2.72 (1.37-5.38) 0.7 (0.55-0.89) 64.04%
Treg (%) 3.82 0.653 (0.548-0.758) 44.44% (32.00%-57.62%) 90.00% (79.85%-95.34%) 80.00% (62.70%-90.50%) 64.29% (53.62%-73.70%) 4.44 (1.97-10.05) 0.62 (0.48-0.8) 68.42%
CD4+ T cell function (%) 13.8 0.764 (0.676-0.852) 42.59% (30.33%-55.84%) 90.00% (79.85%-95.34%) 79.31% (61.61%-90.16%) 63.53% (52.92%-72.97%) 4.26 (1.88-9.67) 0.64 (0.5-0.81) 67.54%
CD8+ T cell function (%) 41.2 0.761 (0.669-0.852) 62.96% (49.63%-74.58%) 83.33% (71.97%-90.69%) 77.27% (63.01%-87.16%) 71.43% (59.95%-80.68%) 3.78 (2.07-6.89) 0.44 (0.31-0.64) 73.68%
NK cell function (%) 62.1 0.716 (0.620-0.813) 37.04% (25.42%-50.37%) 93.33% (84.08%-97.38%) 83.33% (64.15%-93.32%) 62.22% (51.90%-71.54%) 5.56 (2.03-15.23) 0.67 (0.54-0.84) 66.67%
Diagnostic model 0.676 0.911 (0.855-0.967) 81.48% (69.16%-89.62%) 90.00% (79.85%-95.34%) 88.00% (76.20%-94.38%) 84.38% (73.57%-91.29%) 8.15 (3.77-17.59) 0.21 (0.12-0.36) 85.96%

Compared with diagnostic model using z statistic, P < 0.01; compared with diagnostic model using z statistic, P < 0.001; ATB, active tuberculosis; HC, healthy controls; AUC, area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; CI, confidence interval.