Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;23(6):719–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.02.008

Table 3.

Re-Analysis of EBV Using Prospective Samples to Investigate Viral Load Disparity Seen with Galileo and qPCR Assays

Sample identification Galileo assay, log10 IU/mL qPCR assay, log10 IU/mL Log difference
EBV 1 ND 3.70
EBV 2 3.54 3.62 0.08
EBV 3 3.54 4.14 0.60
EBV 4 4.82 3.46 1.36
EBV 5 ND 3.38
EBV 6 ND 3.38
EBV 7 2.77 3.43 0.66
EBV 8 3.87 3.96 0.09
EBV 9 3.5 3.66 0.16
EBV 10 3.72 4.56 0.84
EBV 11 4.75 4.52 0.23
EBV 12 3.79 3.41 0.38
EBV 13 3.65 3.70 0.05
EBV 14 ND 3.65
EBV 15 2.51 3.40 0.89
EBV 16 2.94 3.56 0.62
EBV 17 2.42 3.23 0.81
EBV 18 2.75 3.20 0.45
EBV 19 1.82 3.18 1.36
EBV 20 ND 3.18

EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; ND, not determined; qPCR, real-time quantitative PCR.