Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 26;4(1):81–91. doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v4i1.625

TABLE 5.

Association Between Respondents' Socio–Demographic Characteristics, Other Factors and Good Utilisation of IPTp–SP

Variable IPTp utilisation OR [95%CI] P-value aOR [95%CI] P-value
Good Poor Freq (%) Freq (%)
Age (years)
 <35 62 (25.5) 181 (74.5) 1.3 [0.7 – 2.5] .437 -
 ≥35 14 (20.9) 53 (79.1)
Gestational age at 1stANC visit
Early 68 (28.0) 175 (72.0) 2.8 [1.3 – 6.7] .011 3.3 [1.4 -7.7] .005
 Late 8 (11.9) 59 (88.1)
Marital status
 Married 74 (24.9) 223 (75.1) 1.8 [0.4 – 8.4] .651 -
 Not married 2 (15.4) 11 (84.6)
Parity
 0–4 55 (23.8) 176 (76.2) 0.9 [0.5 – 1.6] .731 -
 ≥5 21 (26.6) 58 (73.4)
Location
 Rural 66 (27.3) 176 (72.7) 2.2 [1.1 – 4.7] .048 1.7 [0.8–3.9] .184
 Urban 10 (14.7) 58 (85.3)
Education
 Formal 69 (29.0) 169 (71.0) 3.7 [1.7 – 9.3] .001 5.0 [2.1–12.3] <.001
 Non–formal 7 (9.7) 65 (90.3)
Distance from home to ANC
 ≤ 5 km 64 (24.6) 196 (75.4) 1.03 [0.5 – 2.2] .999 -
 >5 km 12 (24.0) 38 (76.0)
Knowledge on IPT
 Good 64 (31.1) 142 (68.9) 3.4 [1.8 – 7.0] <.001 2.5 [1.4 – 4.5] .002
 Poor 12 (11.5) 92 (88.5)