Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;17(5):2868–2885. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00081

Table 4. Comparison of the Two-Point Extrapolation Scheme EP(m/n, τ) with τ = 3 and τ = 7 and the ICE(TGen,τ) Single-Point Energiesa.

  error (mH)
  extrapolated
  E(Var+PT2)
  τ
  τ
EP(m/n) 3 7 ICE(TGen,τ) 3 7
(4/5) 0.080(0.130) 0.040(0.050) 5 0.800(1.100) 0.070(0.080)
(5/6) 0.018(0.025) 0.005(0.012) 6 0.180(0.260) 0.013(0.016)
(6/7) 0.004(0.005) 0.004(0.006) 7 0.030(0.040) 0.002(0.005)
(7/8) 0.002(0.004)   8 0.007(0.009)  
  cost (seconds)
  extrapolated
  E(Var+PT2)
  τ
  τ
EP(m/n) 3 7 ICE(TGen,τ) 3 7
(4/5) 898.5 6312.7 5 704.7 4407.0
(5/6) 2639.6 22112.7 6 1934.8 17705.7
(6/7) 7911.0 66786.0 7 5976.2 49080.3
(7/8) 27694.0   8 21717.8  
a

The FCI21 data has been used to compute the error (in mH) between the FCI energy and the ICE/two-point EP(m/n,τ) extrapolated energies. The variance of the computed error (i.e., error bars) are given in parentheses. Timings correspond to the same FCI21 set. All results are for the CSF-ICE variant.