Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;125(23):5124–5145. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c03168

Table 3. Comparisons of the Formation Enthalpies Computed in This Work with Literature Data.

species ΔfH298K (this work) ΔfH298K (Goldsmith)43 ΔfH298K (ATcT)52,53 ΔfH298K (Burcat)58
C2H4 51.99 52.30 52.36 52.50
Ċ2H5 120.61 120.92 119.99 119.70
Ċ2H3 297.29 297.90 296.93 296.58
C3H6 19.88 19.25 19.93 20.00
3H7 100.23 101.67 100.94 101.32
3H7 87.92 88.70 88.45 90.19
Ċ3H5-s 267.07 268.19 267.38 265.53
Ċ3H5-t 251.79 253.13 252.58 237.65
Ċ3H5-a 165.55 169.87 168.31 168.60
C4H8-1 –0.21 –0.00 0.05 –0.03
C4H8-2 –11.30 –11.30 –11.18 –11.19
Ċ4H9-1 78.86 80.75 80.23 81.80
Ċ4H9-2 68.02 69.45 66.07 70.22
Ċ4H7-11 246.82 248.11   245.87
Ċ4H7-12 232.66     231.16
Ċ4H7-13 135.21 137.65   136.11
Ċ4H7-14 206.50 208.36   204.60
Ċ4H7-22 223.32 225.10   223.85
iC4H8 –17.60 –17.15 –17.05 –17.57
4H9 72.29 74.48 73.18 73.79
4H9 50.77 54.39 50.30 55.04
4H7 134.68 139.32   137.60
4H7-i1 233.84