Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;28(7):1401–1410. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab016

Table 3.

Subjective measures for the EHR and asthma timeline application

EHR b Asthma Visualization b 95% CI of the Differences P Value c
NASA Task Load Index (raw format)
Mental 50.83 (24.1) 14.58 (13.4) [−49.94, −22.56] <.001
Physical 9.17 (15.3) 4.58 (10.5) [−12.06, 2.89] .2
Temporal 55.83 (23.3) 12.92 (16.6) [−59.08, −26.75] <.001
Effort 55.42 (25.2) 10.0 (10.4) [−62.63, −28.20] <.001
Frustration 52.5 (28.2) 5.83 (13.3) [−66.27, −27.07] <.001
Performance 47.08 (18.4) 17.08 (15.9) [−44.65, −15.35] <.001
Overall 45.14 (15.1) 10.83 (10.7) [−44.14, −24.47] <.001
Usability/utility questionsa
This system is easy to use to determine a patient's asthma history. 2.42 (1.0) 4.75 (0.5) [1.65, 3.02] <.001
This system is efficient in helping me determine a patient's asthma history. 2.50 (0.9) 4.83 (0.4) [1.77, 2.90] <.001
This system provides useful features to determine a patient's asthma history. 2.92 (1.1) 4.92 (0.3) [1.34, 2.66] <.001
This system helps me feel confident in determining a patient's asthma history. 2.83 (0.8) 4.58 (0.5) [1.36, 2.14] <.001
This system provides important patient information in addressing the care of asthmatic patients in the ED. 3.50 (0.7) 4.67 (0.5) [0.71, 1.62] <.001
Overall, I am satisfied with how this system is designed to address the care of asthmatic patients in the ED. 2.75 (1.2) 4.75 (0.5) [1.28, 2.72] <.001
a

5-point Likert-type scale: 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.

b

All values reported are mean (SD).

c

Paired t-test.