Table 8.
Assessment scales for use in opioid-induced constipation (OIC)
| Scale | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Assessment of Constipation—Symptoms (PAC-SYM)a |
Not yet validated for OIC High number of questions → time-consuming and poor applicability in a clinical setting |
|
| Patient Assessment of Constipation—Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) | ||
| Knowles–Eccersley–Scott Symptom Score | ||
| Constipation Assessment Scale | ||
| Stool Symptom Screener |
Qualitative interviews Not sufficiently validated for comparative or sequential assessment of clinical status in patients with OIC [116] |
|
| Bowel Function Diary |
Validated for OIC by the FDA Developed according to the methodology based on PRO Assessment of both symptoms and their severity [115] |
Not easy to use [114] More suited to controlled clinical trials than to routine clinical practice [114] |
| Bowel Function Index |
Validated and tested for OIC Three simple questions Subjective assessment of OIC Administered by a physician or appropriately trained nurse/nursing assistant Uses numerical rating scales Fast, effective and reliable |
|
FDA US Food and Drug Administration, PRO patient-reported outcomes
aA version of PAC-SYM is also available for patients with chronic low back pain and OIC