Table 1.
Number (percentage) of respondents (all, industry and other) that considered the common data elements-related questions importanta with p-values of Pearson tests for differences between industry and the other stakeholders
All (N = 73) | Industry (N = 42) | Other (N = 31) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Medication: which of the following details with regard to the medicinal product to treat the disease of interest should be captured? | ||||
Dosage | 70 (96) | 40 (95) | 30 (97) | 0.74 |
Substance name | 66 (90) | 40 (95) | 26 (84) | 0.10 |
Reason for stop/switch to other product registered | 65 (89) | 39 (93) | 26 (84) | 0.22 |
Start and stop date | 61 (84) | 35 (83) | 26 (84) | 0.95 |
Duration of the treatment | 49 (67) | 25 (60) | 24 (77) | 0.11 |
ATCb classification | 33 (45) | 14 (33) | 19 (61) | 0.02 |
Pregnancy: if women of childbearing potential are captured in the registry, how important is the collection of the following data if a woman becomes pregnant?c | ||||
Exposure during pregnancyd | 64 (90) | 42 (100) | 22 (76) | <0.01 |
Outcome of pregnancyd | 64 (90) | 40 (95) | 24 (83) | 0.20 |
Trimester during exposuree,f | 58 (84) | 36 (88) | 22 (79) | 0.61 |
Follow-up teratogenic eventsd,g | 58 (84) | 35 (88) | 23 (79) | 0.26 |
Follow-up childd,g | 55 (80) | 34 (85) | 21 (72) | 0.12 |
Follow-up mothere,h | 51 (75) | 33 (80) | 18 (67) | 0.25 |
Birth weightf,g | 43 (63) | 23 (58) | 20 (71) | 0.06 |
Safety outcomes: which adverse drug events should be collected? | ||||
Adverse events of special interest | 47 (64) | 27 (64) | 20 (65) | 0.98 |
Serious adverse events | 45 (62) | 24 (57) | 21 (68) | 0.36 |
All adverse events | 31 (42) | 18 (43) | 13 (42) | 0.94 |
For adverse events potentially related to medicinal products the following should be recordedc | ||||
Severity of the event | 71 (97) | 41 (98) | 30 (97) | 0.97 |
Duration of the event | 62 (85) | 34 (81) | 28 (90) | 0.74 |
A causality assessmente | 61 (85) | 38 (90) | 23 (77) | 0.30 |
aAn element was considered important if ≥80% of the respondents gave it a score of important or very important
bATC classification: Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification
cQuestion assessed using a Likert scale. See ESM, for additional figures of all answers to the Likert scales
dTwo missing from the respondents from the other stakeholders
eOne missing from the respondents from industry
fThree missing from the respondents from the other stakeholders
gTwo missing from the respondents from industry
hFour missing from the respondents from the other stakeholders