Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 6;44(8):853–861. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01081-z

Table 2.

Number (percentage) of respondents (all, industry and other) that considered the governance-related questions importanta with p-values of Pearson χ2 tests for differences between industry and the other stakeholders

All (N = 73) Industry (N = 42) Other (N = 31) P-value
How important are the following statements about data sharing in relation to governance of a registry?b
 Availability of a central contact point 70 (96) 41 (98) 29 (94) 0.25
 Data sharing across countries 63 (86) 36 (86) 27 (87) 0.75
 Data linkage to other data sources 55 (75) 33 (79) 22 (71) 0.07
 Request for additional information, if needed by external stakeholders 52 (71) 36 (86) 16 (52) <0.01
How relevant is it for regulatory decision-making that registry data are shared with …?b
 Regulatory authoritiesc 68 (94) 39 (95) 29 (94) 0.69
 Academic centresc 61 (85) 36 (88) 25 (81) 0.18
 Pharmaceutical companiesc 51 (71) 37 (90) 14 (45) <0.01
How acceptable is it that a registry is (partly) financed by ... if the data are to be used by regulators:b
 Regulatory authoritiesd 66 (92) 37 (88) 29 (97) 0.20
 Academiad 60 (83) 38 (90) 22 (73) 0.12
 Independent stakeholdersd 57 (79) 32 (76) 25 (83) 0.29
 Pharmaceutical companiesd 56 (78) 40 (95) 16 (53) <0.01
 Patientsd 38 (53) 26 (62) 12 (40) 0.11
FAIR: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable - How important is it that the data of the registry should be FAIR?c
(median, IQR) 92 (81–100) 92 (81–100) 95 (82–100) 0.89

IQR interquartile range

aAn element was considered important if ≥80% of the respondents gave it a score of important or very important

bSee ESM, for additional figures of all answers to the Likert scales

cOne missing from the respondents from industry

dOne missing from the respondents from the other stakeholders