Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 22;36(8):1677–1684. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03887-w

Table 3.

Correlation between LLN metastasis and clinical and MRA status

LLN metastasis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Negative (n = 82) Positive (n = 20) P value Odds ratio 95% C.I. P value
Clinical status
Age (<64/≥64 years) 39/43 14/6 0.072
Sex (male/female) 53/59 11/9 0.424
Tumor central location (Ra/Rb, P) 15/67 3/17 0.510
Distance from anal verge (<5/≥5 cm) 40/42 14/6 0.088
CEA level (<5/≥5 ng/mL) 52/30 13/7 0.895
CA19-9 level (<38/≥38 U/mL) 75/7 16/4 0.141
Tumor size (<44/≥44 mm) 37/45 14/6 0.046 1.328 0.389–4.537 0.651
cT status (≤cT1, T2/≥cT3, T4) 21/61 3/17 0.245
cN status (proximal lymph node area) (positive/negative) 56/26 16/4 0.303
Clinical LLN status (positive/negative) 13/69 13/7 <0.001 7.409 2.316–23.697 0.001
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no) 13/69 8/12 0.023
Distant metastasis (cM0/cM1) 74/8 17/3 0.369
Tumor resection margin (R0/R1) 75/7 18/2 0.561
MRA status evaluated by ceMRI
MRA (positive/negative) 48/34 19/1 0.002 8.922 1.045–76.159 0.045
Laterality of MRA <0.001
Bilateral/unilateral/absent 18/30/34 14/5/1

LLN lateral lymph node, MRA middle rectal artery, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9, AL type antero-lateral type, L type lateral type, PL type postero-lateral type