Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 13;44(8):889–897. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01082-y

Table 2.

Reporting odds ratio and empirical Bayesian geometric mean values for VTE, MI, and CVA composites

JAKinibs (FDA approval date) Composite Primary suspect cases ROR (95% CIa) EBGM (95% CIa)

Ruxolitinib

16 Nov 2011

CTEc 328 0.90 (0.81–1.00) 1.11b (1.01)
MI 176 0.44 (0.38–0.52) 0.55 (0.49)
CVA 355 0.66 (0.60–0.74) 0.82 (0.75)

Tofacitinib

6 Nov 2012

CTEb 352 1.04 (0.94–1.16) 1.06 (0.97)
MI 228 0.61 (0.54–0.70) 0.63 (0.56)
CVA 312 0.62 (0.55–0.69) 0.63 (0.58)

Tofacitinib XR

24 Feb 2016

CTE 100 0.58 (0.47–0.70) 0.59 (0.50)
MI 74 0.49 (0.39–0.62) 0.50 (0.41)
CVA 108 0.41 (0.34–0.49) 0.41 (0.35)

Upadacitinib

16 Aug 2019

CTEd 1 6.83 (0.94–49.56) 1.42 (0.23)
MI 0 NA NA
CVAd 1 4.69 (0.65–34.05) 1.16 (0.20)

Baricitinib

31 May 2018

CTEc 41 7.43b (5.45–10.13) 4.83b (3.70)
MI 10 2.22b (1.19–4.13) 1.42 (0.82)
CVA 17 2.00b (1.24–3.22) 1.15 (0.77)

CI confidence interval, CTE composite thromboembolic event, CVA cerebrovascular accident, EBGM empirical Bayesian geometric mean, JAKinibs Janus kinase inhibitors, MI myocardial infarction, NA not available, ROR reporting odds ratio, TE thromboembolic event, VTE venous thromboembolism, XR extended release

aTwo-sided CI for ROR; one-sided CI for EBGM

bROR or EBGM lower-bound CI values > 1

cBoth ROR and EBGM lower-bound CI values were > 1.0

dA trend where both ROR and EBGM were above 1.0, but neither lower-bound CI was above 1.0