Table 2.
Endophytic bacteria | Protective effect (24 hbi) | Curative effect (24 hai) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | FLBC | FL | Control | FLBC | FL | |||||
Severity | Severity | Control efficacy | Severity | Control efficacy | Severity | Severity | Control efficacy | Severity | Control efficacy | |
Paenibacillus xylanexedens 7A | 75.21 ± 0.89 | 36.45 ± 2.5Aa | 61.11 | 35.67 ± 2.0Aa | 61.95 | 75.01 ± 1.89 | 52.05 ± 2.5Aa | 44.47 | 63.38 ± 3.0Ba | 21.36 |
Serratia marcescens 3A | 63.62 ± 7.9Abd | 32.12 | 69.43 ± 5.6Bbd | 25.93 | 59.12 ± 7.8Ab | 15.51 | 73.36 ± 5.2Ba | 5.92 | ||
Bacillus subtilus 11A | 41.38 ± 5.3Aa | 55.85 | 41.72 ± 7.5Aac | 55.49 | 69.67 ± 5.3Ac | 25.89 | 57.34 ± 7.5Bb | 38.99 | ||
Bacillus megaterium 6A | 32.65 ± 11.1Aa | 65.16 | 38.69 ± 6.0Ba | 58.68 | 50.56 ± 12.1Aa | 46.07 | 46.04 ± 6.0Ac | 50.99 | ||
Staphylococcus agentis 15A | 62.45 ± 4.2Acd | 22.71 | 65.28 ± 5.2Bcd | 29.64 | 64.20 ± 4.2Ad | 9.48 | 65.87 ± 5.2Aa | 8.61 |
Data presented here are mean ± standard deviation.
Means were compared with Tukey HSD (p ≤ 0.01, 0.05).
The data are the means of 10 plants per treatment with three replications. Low case letters showed comparisons among the 5 bacterial treatments and capital letters showed comparisons among bacterial formulations (FLBC and FL).